Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5481
Next month in: 02:48:19
Server time: 01:11:40, May 11, 2024 CET
Currently online (6): Algiers | Baratheon | gattus | hexaus19 | LC73DunMHP | Zogu | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: right to strike

Details

Submitted by[?]: Seosavists Republican party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: December 2142

Description[?]:

Everyone should have a right to strike.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date02:17:57, November 13, 2005 CET
FromLuthori Green Party
ToDebating the right to strike
MessageYEs.

Date03:28:28, November 13, 2005 CET
FromSocial Calvinist Unionist Party
ToDebating the right to strike
MessageSure.

Date23:56:18, November 13, 2005 CET
FromCovenanters (IA)
ToDebating the right to strike
MessageSo if HM Armed Forces are on strike, providing a minimum home defence service, what happens to our foreign policy objectives and treaty obligations?

Date00:29:58, November 14, 2005 CET
FromUnited Conservative Party
ToDebating the right to strike
MessageNO!!

Absolutely NOT.

Unless of course you mean the right for hereditary landowners to strike their serfs if they get uppity.

Date18:40:18, November 14, 2005 CET
FromSeosavists Republican party
ToDebating the right to strike
Message"what happens to our foreign policy objectives and treaty obligations?"
That would be part of a minimal service and anything the military would strike about should be looked into immediately we don't want an ineffective army or an anti-government army, which if they are stopped from getting what they need is what would happen.

Date23:46:36, November 14, 2005 CET
FromUnited Conservative Party
ToDebating the right to strike
MessageStrikers should be sacked, gaoled, shot or burned ... relative to the situation, of course.

There is no such thing as a military "strike" unless you're talking about attacking the enemy.

A withdrawal of services by military personnel is usually called "mutiny".

Mutineers are, naturally, shot!

Date23:54:27, November 14, 2005 CET
FromCovenanters (IA)
ToDebating the right to strike
MessageAs are deserters. The same rules should apply to firefighters and medical personnel.

Date10:35:21, November 15, 2005 CET
FromUnited Conservative Party
ToDebating the right to strike
MessageQuite right, my good sir!

And policemen, customs officials, prison warders, teachers, workers in essential industries (like armaments and dock labour), bankers, news media, electricity maintenance and supply -- and ice-cream makers.

Actually, the more I reflect on it ... is there ANYONE who should be ALLOWED to strike? I mean, in a society of equals, we can't only workers in essential industries to "self-sacrifice" without asking others to do likewise.

No, no. The right to strike should be abolished.

Forthwith.

Date10:36:18, November 15, 2005 CET
FromUnited Conservative Party
ToDebating the right to strike
Message*... can't only ask workers ...*

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 362

no
   

Total Seats: 299

abstain
 

Total Seats: 89


Random fact: There are two countries based on Egypt in the game. Cobura is based on modern Egypt with a retro twist, while Hawu Mumenhes is based on Ancient Egypt with a modernist twist.

Random quote: "The trouble with communism is the communists, just as the trouble with Christianity is the Christians" - Henry Louis Mencken

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 70