We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Foreign Policy Reform Bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: Social Liberal Republicans (PET)
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 3019
Description[?]:
Opening our eyes to the world |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change
The government's policy regarding foreign embassies.
Old value:: Foreign countries may establish an embassy after obtaining approval from the Foreign Office.
Current: Foreign countries may establish an embassy after obtaining approval from the Foreign Office.
Proposed: Any other country may establish an embassy on national soil.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 22:04:00, October 21, 2010 CET | From | Social Liberal Republicans (PET) | To | Debating the Foreign Policy Reform Bill |
Message | We would like to welcome all refugee's, not just those in extreame circumstances, and give them aid. We feel that our population and economy would benefit from these extra people of working age We would also allow all nations to establish embassies. We need to work with all nations, not just those that we like. The only way to change influence nations with whom we have differences, is to engage with them |
Date | 01:14:22, October 22, 2010 CET | From | People's Independence Party | To | Debating the Foreign Policy Reform Bill |
Message | If there are no jobs for these refugees, they will not improve the economy. The current laws are fine. |
Date | 23:25:23, October 22, 2010 CET | From | Social Liberal Republicans (PET) | To | Debating the Foreign Policy Reform Bill |
Message | what about embassies? |
Date | 23:50:49, October 22, 2010 CET | From | Popular Stability | To | Debating the Foreign Policy Reform Bill |
Message | The current policy on embassies is sensible. Only nations who are hostile to Endralon or who pursue unpardonable policies would be refused permission. |
Date | 00:55:16, October 23, 2010 CET | From | Social Liberal Republicans (PET) | To | Debating the Foreign Policy Reform Bill |
Message | Should we not be engaging with all nations, even those we not not agree with? Only then will we exercise influence on them. |
Date | 15:10:43, October 23, 2010 CET | From | ƒortenohƒiv (ACN) | To | Debating the Foreign Policy Reform Bill |
Message | If I am correct, we don't have any hostilities. So, until that day comes I think we should keep an open mind for everybody. I also think we do not do too much on an international level, and need to boost relationships with our continental neighbors. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes | Total Seats: 107 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 163 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: By default the head of government is the ultimate authority within a national government. In general terms, heads of government are expected to consult with cabinet colleagues (including those from other parties) before making significant decisions but they remain responsible for government action. |
Random quote: "You don't have to buy from anyone. You don't have to work at any particular job. You don't have to participate in any given relationship. You can choose." - Harry Browne |