Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: April 5475
Next month in: 01:59:23
Server time: 06:00:36, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): ADM Drax | R Drax | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Right to Serve Act of 3039

Details

Submitted by[?]: Republican Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: April 3040

Description[?]:

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date10:50:55, December 03, 2010 CET
FromHutorian Workers Party (LL)
ToDebating the Right to Serve Act of 3039
MessageHWP Leader, Jeremy Douglas,

Mr Speaker, we welcome this Bill. It removes discrimination from the military and in our opinions - for the better. We call on the government to support this Act - after all socialism is about equality and not division.

Date12:55:19, December 03, 2010 CET
FromHutorian Conservative Party
ToDebating the Right to Serve Act of 3039
MessageRt Hon Karl Harrod, Prime Minister,

Mr Speaker, we will accept these proposals by the Workers Party. I believe that together the NSC and HWP working together for a better Hutorian socialist future would serve our nation in good stead. Our party is also open to the idea of the Labour Party also involved but it appears they have aligned themselves with the tories.

Date16:46:46, December 03, 2010 CET
FromCrown Loyalist Party
ToDebating the Right to Serve Act of 3039
MessageMr. Speaker,

I would just like to point out these were proposed by the conservative party not the workers party. Once again the NSC proves that they cannot read!

Date16:55:30, December 03, 2010 CET
FromRepublican Party
ToDebating the Right to Serve Act of 3039
MessageEdward Hazzard, Defence spokesperon,

Mr. Speaker,

We are somewhat surprised that the HNSC has basically given us positive feedback on this matter despite being unaware of it. Maybe they will change their minds and vote against once they realise it was our party, the Conservatives, that proposed this bill.

I would also like to make it clear to the HNSC how desperate they're looking... harassing parties for support is not the way to go about things.

Date17:09:25, December 03, 2010 CET
FromHutorian Conservative Party
ToDebating the Right to Serve Act of 3039
MessageMr Speaker, funny comment by the tories actually. Perhaps i can share to the House some of their...well lets say statements about the Labour Party.

"currently in Hutori we have two parties that are making a complete laughing stock out of a potentially workable and just ideology" - reffering to the NSC and Labour.

"It is unfortunate that bout the National Socialists and the Labour Party both follow a deluded form of ideology."

"both the Hutori National-Socialist Congress and the Labour Party both follow a perverted form of socialism"

"We are frankly not interested in the HNSC-Labour love affair"

"We would certainly not co-operate with such diluded politicians in government" - reffering to the NSC and Labour

"We sincerely look forward to a HNSC-Labour government. The more you destroy Hutori the better"

"The HNSC will only get a coalition because the Labour Party is probably as desperate to get into power as your own party."

Mr Speaker, for a party that has just tried to align themselves with the Labour Party under the (UAF) banner....have they ever said a nice word about them or any party in Hutori. I cannot recall anything of the sort

Date19:58:55, December 03, 2010 CET
FromRepublican Party
ToDebating the Right to Serve Act of 3039
MessageEdward Hazzard, Defence spokesperon,

Mr. Speaker,

Unfortunately we are not desperate for power and thus do not fall over ourselves trying to appeal to other parties. Regardless of our controversial statements, the Labour Party have shown understanding towards us and our party has turned a new leaf in regards to our position over the Labour Party.

The Labour Party, we now realise, has good intentions. It is good to see the HNSC panicking because it sees the UAF as a genuine threat, this being the only reason why they're attacking the UAF Alliance.

They can say all they wish, the alliance between the Conservatives and Labour against fascism will not be broken over petty comments, nor comments made by the HNSC. We can tell election time is close.

Date20:32:46, December 03, 2010 CET
FromHutorian Conservative Party
ToDebating the Right to Serve Act of 3039
MessageRt Hon Karl Harrod, Prime Minister,

Mr Speaker, this proves what the NSC has been saying the whole time! The conservatives have absolutely no idea what their partys direction is. Firstly they slander the Labour Party and now they are cosying up to them to try and secure cabinet posts. They appear to have realised the election is between us and Labour and are trying to get on side with one to secure some Cabinet posts. Mr Speaker, if the Tories are now coalesing with Labour will they apologise for all those comments i outlined above?

Mr Speaker, the NSC is no stranger to these alliances. I remember a time and Labour will as well - the time of the United Movement. Where is this movement today? In the ground Mr Speaker, because the NSC defeated them one by one. I can guarantee the UAF the exact same fate....

Date21:07:46, December 03, 2010 CET
FromRepublican Party
ToDebating the Right to Serve Act of 3039
MessageEdward Hazzard, Defence spokesperon,

Mr. Speaker,

The Conservative-Labour-Crown Loyalist's united stance against fascism was never down to cosying up to anyone, we were offered the opportunity to take a united stance against fascism and we are doing so. We have already declared that we would only be willing to enter government with the right party.. we're not desperate for power.

If it makes the HNSC feel better, yes, we do apologise to the Labour Party, for something that caused them no offense at all considering their recent kindness towards us and newfound unity.

The Conservative Party, I can assure you, Mr. Speaker, will go on and on and on and on, likewise, the UAF will go on and on and on and on. Mr. Speaker, these recent attacks clearly indicate that the HNSC sees the UAF Alliance as a threat and may it always be so.

Date21:40:32, December 03, 2010 CET
FromHutorian Conservative Party
ToDebating the Right to Serve Act of 3039
MessageRt Hon Karl Harrod, Prime Minister,

Mr Speaker, we invite Labour to tell the Conservatives what happened to the United Movement. The UM was four parties versus the NSC. We defeated them and we will do the same to the UAF. May we also add, what would the tories like us to do with this UAF. Say to them, well...we hope you win at the next election? What a ridiculous notion. The LL coalition between ourselves and the workers party is two versus three. Two political machines can obviously not match three but we shall convince the people of Hutori with our policies.

Mr Speaker, obviously the UAF is a threat. A threat to the people of this state and the LL will stop the UAF at all costs.

Date21:42:33, December 03, 2010 CET
FromHutorian Conservative Party
ToDebating the Right to Serve Act of 3039
Messageooc : obviously after these elections a new cabinet will be formed. Are all parties willing to play by the suggested rules - http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=306109. It will only work if all parties will go along with it. It will make Hutori more interesting in general and make this a more realistic government.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
     

Total Seats: 391

no

    Total Seats: 0

    abstain
     

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Real-life religions should not be referenced in Particracy. Terra has its own religions, many of which mirror real-life ones. See: http://particracy.wikia.com/wiki/Illustrated_Catalogue_of_Religion

    Random quote: "I reject the cynical view that politics is a dirty business." - Richard M. Nixon

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 71