Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5475
Next month in: 00:03:16
Server time: 03:56:43, April 27, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): ADM Drax | R Drax | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Constitutional Amendment

Details

Submitted by[?]: Sozialliberale Partei der Demokraten

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: December 3042

Description[?]:

Redefining the power of the Head of the State.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date13:52:34, December 08, 2010 CET
FromSozial Demokraten Malivias
ToDebating the Constitutional Amendment
MessageWe support art 1 only. The SDM feels that art 2 is democratically a step backwards.

Date15:52:35, December 08, 2010 CET
FromSozialliberale Partei der Demokraten
ToDebating the Constitutional Amendment
MessageWell, you could be right.

Date17:48:13, December 08, 2010 CET
FromSozialliberale Partei der Demokraten
ToDebating the Constitutional Amendment
MessageArticle 2 is removed.

Date17:48:54, December 08, 2010 CET
FromSozialliberale Partei der Demokraten
ToDebating the Constitutional Amendment
Messageand altered (completly new)

Date18:14:23, December 08, 2010 CET
FromGroßmalivische Reichspartei
ToDebating the Constitutional Amendment
MessageFührer des Malivischen Volkes, Ferdinand Völkherz,

We completely support this.

Date18:52:07, December 08, 2010 CET
FromSozialliberale Partei der Demokraten
ToDebating the Constitutional Amendment
MessageIs there any reason why the KPM is voting against this bill?

Date21:59:59, December 08, 2010 CET
FromSozialliberale Partei der Demokraten
ToDebating the Constitutional Amendment
MessageToo bad that KPM and GW are not explaining their vote to the voters.

Date22:07:41, December 08, 2010 CET
FromGroßmalivische Reichspartei
ToDebating the Constitutional Amendment
MessageFührer des Malivischen Volkes,Ferdinand Völkherz,
Oberste Führer des Tiggen Bundesland und Westland Bundesland,

The KPM have an excuse as conservatives, but I too would be interested the reason behind the Wohlfahrtspartei's vote.

Date07:59:46, December 09, 2010 CET
FromSozial Demokraten Malivias
ToDebating the Constitutional Amendment
MessageIndeed, why is the GW not supporting this proposal ?

Date14:42:34, December 09, 2010 CET
FromKonservative Partei Malivia
ToDebating the Constitutional Amendment
MessageGerhard Fleck:

We are voting against this, because we don't want political instablity in this country. The current legth of the term is completly okey, and I don't see any point in changing it.

Date15:08:43, December 09, 2010 CET
FromSozialliberale Partei der Demokraten
ToDebating the Constitutional Amendment
MessageWe ARE HAVING political instability at the moment as neither of the parties is able to form a coalition government. Furthermore, elections always mirror the voter's will. By doing so more often, Malivia would become more democratic.

Date17:03:11, December 09, 2010 CET
FromKonservative Partei Malivia
ToDebating the Constitutional Amendment
MessageThen we must let the voters speak in earlier elections.

Date18:24:29, December 09, 2010 CET
FromGroßmalivische Reichspartei
ToDebating the Constitutional Amendment
MessageFührer des Malivischen Volkes,Ferdinand Völkherz,
Oberste Führer des Tiggen Bundesland und Westland Bundesland,

We are only voting in favour due to Article 1, which is vital. Parties need to be able to propose as much legislation as possible in order to represent the people. We support a reduction in term length but view 36 months as too short.

Date18:33:13, December 09, 2010 CET
FromSozialliberale Partei der Demokraten
ToDebating the Constitutional Amendment
MessageWould 48 be a proposal that the KPM could agree upon?

Date19:10:40, December 09, 2010 CET
FromGroßmalivische Reichspartei
ToDebating the Constitutional Amendment
Message(OOC: KPM or MVP? KPM already said they don't see any point in changing it.. My party would support 48 months)

Date19:14:38, December 09, 2010 CET
FromSozialliberale Partei der Demokraten
ToDebating the Constitutional Amendment
MessageOOC: Yes, KPM. As you already suggested to support 48.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 372

no
  

Total Seats: 228

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Each user account may only be used by the player who set it up. Handing over an account to another player is not allowed.

    Random quote: "Communism is like prohibition, it's a good idea but it won't work." - Will Rogers

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 71