We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Constitutional Amendment
Details
Submitted by[?]: Sozialliberale Partei der Demokraten
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 3042
Description[?]:
| Redefining the power of the Head of the State. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The number of proposals a party can introduce per year (will be handed out as a monthly quota).
Old value:: 14
Current: 20
Proposed: 20
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The length of a legislative and executive term, in months. Should be between 24 and 72.
Old value:: 60
Current: 60
Proposed: 36
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 13:52:34, December 08, 2010 CET | From | Sozial Demokraten Malivias | To | Debating the Constitutional Amendment |
| Message | We support art 1 only. The SDM feels that art 2 is democratically a step backwards. |
| Date | 15:52:35, December 08, 2010 CET | From | Sozialliberale Partei der Demokraten | To | Debating the Constitutional Amendment |
| Message | Well, you could be right. |
| Date | 17:48:13, December 08, 2010 CET | From | Sozialliberale Partei der Demokraten | To | Debating the Constitutional Amendment |
| Message | Article 2 is removed. |
| Date | 17:48:54, December 08, 2010 CET | From | Sozialliberale Partei der Demokraten | To | Debating the Constitutional Amendment |
| Message | and altered (completly new) |
| Date | 18:14:23, December 08, 2010 CET | From | Großmalivische Reichspartei | To | Debating the Constitutional Amendment |
| Message | Führer des Malivischen Volkes, Ferdinand Völkherz, We completely support this. |
| Date | 18:52:07, December 08, 2010 CET | From | Sozialliberale Partei der Demokraten | To | Debating the Constitutional Amendment |
| Message | Is there any reason why the KPM is voting against this bill? |
| Date | 21:59:59, December 08, 2010 CET | From | Sozialliberale Partei der Demokraten | To | Debating the Constitutional Amendment |
| Message | Too bad that KPM and GW are not explaining their vote to the voters. |
| Date | 22:07:41, December 08, 2010 CET | From | Großmalivische Reichspartei | To | Debating the Constitutional Amendment |
| Message | Führer des Malivischen Volkes,Ferdinand Völkherz, Oberste Führer des Tiggen Bundesland und Westland Bundesland, The KPM have an excuse as conservatives, but I too would be interested the reason behind the Wohlfahrtspartei's vote. |
| Date | 07:59:46, December 09, 2010 CET | From | Sozial Demokraten Malivias | To | Debating the Constitutional Amendment |
| Message | Indeed, why is the GW not supporting this proposal ? |
| Date | 14:42:34, December 09, 2010 CET | From | Konservative Partei Malivia | To | Debating the Constitutional Amendment |
| Message | Gerhard Fleck: We are voting against this, because we don't want political instablity in this country. The current legth of the term is completly okey, and I don't see any point in changing it. |
| Date | 15:08:43, December 09, 2010 CET | From | Sozialliberale Partei der Demokraten | To | Debating the Constitutional Amendment |
| Message | We ARE HAVING political instability at the moment as neither of the parties is able to form a coalition government. Furthermore, elections always mirror the voter's will. By doing so more often, Malivia would become more democratic. |
| Date | 17:03:11, December 09, 2010 CET | From | Konservative Partei Malivia | To | Debating the Constitutional Amendment |
| Message | Then we must let the voters speak in earlier elections. |
| Date | 18:24:29, December 09, 2010 CET | From | Großmalivische Reichspartei | To | Debating the Constitutional Amendment |
| Message | Führer des Malivischen Volkes,Ferdinand Völkherz, Oberste Führer des Tiggen Bundesland und Westland Bundesland, We are only voting in favour due to Article 1, which is vital. Parties need to be able to propose as much legislation as possible in order to represent the people. We support a reduction in term length but view 36 months as too short. |
| Date | 18:33:13, December 09, 2010 CET | From | Sozialliberale Partei der Demokraten | To | Debating the Constitutional Amendment |
| Message | Would 48 be a proposal that the KPM could agree upon? |
| Date | 19:10:40, December 09, 2010 CET | From | Großmalivische Reichspartei | To | Debating the Constitutional Amendment |
| Message | (OOC: KPM or MVP? KPM already said they don't see any point in changing it.. My party would support 48 months) |
| Date | 19:14:38, December 09, 2010 CET | From | Sozialliberale Partei der Demokraten | To | Debating the Constitutional Amendment |
| Message | OOC: Yes, KPM. As you already suggested to support 48. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes |
Total Seats: 372 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 228 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: You can view helpful ideological statistics about the regions in your nation on the region pages. You can also view detailed political opinions and the importance of them there as well. |
| Random quote: "In all recorded history there has not been one economist who has had to worry about where the next meal would come from." - Peter Drucker |