Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5573
Next month in: 00:05:08
Server time: 19:54:51, November 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): ImportantGuy | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Pure VBS act

Details

Submitted by[?]: VBS Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill proposes the withdrawal from a treaty. It will require half of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: April 2142

Description[?]:

Pass it or beat it

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date23:34:04, November 14, 2005 CET
FromSelucian Liberty Party
ToDebating the Pure VBS act
MessageNo way in Hell

Date23:37:34, November 14, 2005 CET
FromSeleucus Nicator
ToDebating the Pure VBS act
MessageArticle 3, yes.
Article 4, yes.

Not so fast on the first two, though.

Date23:39:35, November 14, 2005 CET
FromSeleucus Nicator
ToDebating the Pure VBS act
MessageWhoa! You're changing it on us. Art. 4 (Food Safety) must be deeply considered before approval, Art. 5 (retirement age) definitely.

Date23:57:59, November 14, 2005 CET
FromVBS Party
ToDebating the Pure VBS act
MessageI guess chances to pass this are small, but I don't care.

Date00:41:17, November 15, 2005 CET
FromSelucian Sovereignty Party
ToDebating the Pure VBS act
MessageClearly, you don't care. But you're doing a bang up job as my court jester!

Date12:12:13, November 15, 2005 CET
FromVBS Party
ToDebating the Pure VBS act
MessageSCREW YOU SSP

I don't appreciate your vision, I don't want you to spam in MY bills

Date18:22:40, November 15, 2005 CET
FromSelucian Sovereignty Party
ToDebating the Pure VBS act
MessageYou said "I don't care", and then I agreed with you. I then complemented you on fulfilling the duties imposed upon you in the Court Jester Act that was passed last session. In response, I get nothing but scorn. Tsk tsk.

I do not care if you don't appreciate my vision. In a democracy, you have to put up with all sorts of dissenting points of view including mine. If you don't want dissenting points of view relayed on "YOUR" bills, then simply don't submit them to this public assembly. It's a fairly simple concept.

Date21:52:14, November 15, 2005 CET
FromVBS Party
ToDebating the Pure VBS act
MessageI don't want you ruining MY debate, an interesting debate with other parties. I knew you didn't respect ME (I don't respect you neither), but I thought you respected the other parties here, who want to debate something

Date22:12:32, November 15, 2005 CET
FromSelucian Sovereignty Party
ToDebating the Pure VBS act
MessageThis isn't YOUR debate. This is the assembly's debate. I'll speak up when appropriate. The other parties are more than capable of speaking up when they see fit. I have full confidence and respect in their abilities in that regard. I am not interfereing in any other party's discussion of this bill with you, and encourage all parties to raise their concerns and feedback to the assembly, if they feel its worth their time.

Date18:15:35, November 16, 2005 CET
FromNorth Majatran Union Congress
ToDebating the Pure VBS act
MessageThis is such a rubbish bill, few if any of the articles are related with one another, absolutely ridiculous.

Date18:16:54, November 16, 2005 CET
FromSelucian Sovereignty Party
ToDebating the Pure VBS act
MessageI think the bill was misnamed. The "V" has to be dropped from the title...

Date18:17:15, November 16, 2005 CET
FromVBS Party
ToDebating the Pure VBS act
MessageI didn't ask for your opinion about THIS BILL, but about THE ARTICLES of this bill.

Date18:23:13, November 16, 2005 CET
FromSelucian Sovereignty Party
ToDebating the Pure VBS act
MessageActually, you didn't ask for anything with respect to opinions of others, though you did order me to specifically not express my opinions.

Might I remind you that game asks you to "propose a BILL" and not "propose a bunch of articles". So by presenting a BILL to an assembly for DISCUSSION, it is implied that you are asking for DISCUSSION and OPINION, about your BILL.

Date19:52:36, November 16, 2005 CET
FromVBS Party
ToDebating the Pure VBS act
MessageOooooooh, someone is showing he's got a dictionary in his office...

Date03:39:55, November 17, 2005 CET
FromSelucian Fascist Party
ToDebating the Pure VBS act
MessageAbsolutely yes.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 144

no
     

Total Seats: 355

abstain
 

Total Seats: 76


Random fact: The people in your nation don't like inactive parties. When you often abstain from voting for a bill, they will dislike your party and your visibility to the electorate will decrease significantly. Low visibility will means you are likely to lose seats. So keep in mind: voting Yes or No is always better than Abstaining.

Random quote: "In any country there must be people who have to die. They are the sacrifices any nation has to make to achieve law and order." - Idi Amin

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 138