We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: SDWF Democratic Workers' Councils Bill, 3050
Details
Submitted by[?]: Social Democratic Workers' Federation
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 3051
Description[?]:
"Let us promote and encourage, through the credibility which the endorsement of the state brings, as well as through financial means, democracy in the workplace." -Arnold Deniau |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government policy on Democratic Workers' Councils.
Old value:: The government does not intervene in the marketplace with regards to Democratic Workers' Councils.
Current: Democratic Workers' Councils are not permitted to run a business.
Proposed: The government encourages the formation of Democratic Workers' Councils through subsidies and tax exemptions.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 20:19:10, December 26, 2010 CET | From | Coalition for National Unity [CNU] | To | Debating the SDWF Democratic Workers' Councils Bill, 3050 |
Message | "It is not the responsibility of the Government to determine the structure of Solentian enterprises." Lord Protector Callermansted, Unionist Chancellor. |
Date | 15:21:22, December 27, 2010 CET | From | Social Democratic Workers' Federation | To | Debating the SDWF Democratic Workers' Councils Bill, 3050 |
Message | "If that were the case, then we would allow private enterprises to do completely as they wish; pay no tax, stamp out competition and sell weapons to our enemies. Secondly, the hypocrisy in your statement is clear for all to see - the Whig Party does not want us to interfere with business, but it is happy to regulate the structure of Solentian families." |
Date | 17:41:11, December 27, 2010 CET | From | Social Democratic Workers' Federation | To | Debating the SDWF Democratic Workers' Councils Bill, 3050 |
Message | *the Unionist Party, my apologies. |
Date | 18:04:16, December 27, 2010 CET | From | Coalition for National Unity [CNU] | To | Debating the SDWF Democratic Workers' Councils Bill, 3050 |
Message | "Regulate solentian families? In what way has the Unionist Bloc done such a thing? The Unionists have been the bastion of social self-determinism for hundreds of years." Lord Protector Callermansted, Unionist Chancellor |
Date | 23:07:45, December 28, 2010 CET | From | Social Democratic Workers' Federation | To | Debating the SDWF Democratic Workers' Councils Bill, 3050 |
Message | "If the SDWF proposed a law to legalise same-sex marriage, would the Unionist Party vote in favour?" |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes | Total Seats: 174 | |||||
no |
Total Seats: 251 | |||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Selucia is Particracy's modern take on Ancient Rome, located on the continent of Majatra. |
Random quote: "When we allow freedom to ring, when we let it ring from every village and every hamlet, from every state and every city, we will be able to speed up that day when all of God's children, black men and white men, Jews and Gentiles, Protestants and Catholics, will be able to join hands and sing in the words of the old Negro spiritual, 'Free at last! free at last! thank God Almighty, we are free at last!'" - Martin Luther King Jr. |