We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: SDWF Democratic Workers' Councils Bill, 3050
Details
Submitted by[?]: Social Democratic Workers' Federation
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 3051
Description[?]:
"Let us promote and encourage, through the credibility which the endorsement of the state brings, as well as through financial means, democracy in the workplace." -Arnold Deniau |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government policy on Democratic Workers' Councils.
Old value:: The government does not intervene in the marketplace with regards to Democratic Workers' Councils.
Current: Democratic Workers' Councils are not permitted to run a business.
Proposed: The government encourages the formation of Democratic Workers' Councils through subsidies and tax exemptions.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 20:19:10, December 26, 2010 CET | From | Coalition for National Unity [CNU] | To | Debating the SDWF Democratic Workers' Councils Bill, 3050 |
Message | "It is not the responsibility of the Government to determine the structure of Solentian enterprises." Lord Protector Callermansted, Unionist Chancellor. |
Date | 15:21:22, December 27, 2010 CET | From | Social Democratic Workers' Federation | To | Debating the SDWF Democratic Workers' Councils Bill, 3050 |
Message | "If that were the case, then we would allow private enterprises to do completely as they wish; pay no tax, stamp out competition and sell weapons to our enemies. Secondly, the hypocrisy in your statement is clear for all to see - the Whig Party does not want us to interfere with business, but it is happy to regulate the structure of Solentian families." |
Date | 17:41:11, December 27, 2010 CET | From | Social Democratic Workers' Federation | To | Debating the SDWF Democratic Workers' Councils Bill, 3050 |
Message | *the Unionist Party, my apologies. |
Date | 18:04:16, December 27, 2010 CET | From | Coalition for National Unity [CNU] | To | Debating the SDWF Democratic Workers' Councils Bill, 3050 |
Message | "Regulate solentian families? In what way has the Unionist Bloc done such a thing? The Unionists have been the bastion of social self-determinism for hundreds of years." Lord Protector Callermansted, Unionist Chancellor |
Date | 23:07:45, December 28, 2010 CET | From | Social Democratic Workers' Federation | To | Debating the SDWF Democratic Workers' Councils Bill, 3050 |
Message | "If the SDWF proposed a law to legalise same-sex marriage, would the Unionist Party vote in favour?" |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes | Total Seats: 174 | |||||
no |
Total Seats: 251 | |||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Players have a responsibility to make a reasonable effort to be accurate when communicating the rules to other players. Any player who manipulatively misleads another player about the rules will be subject to sanction. |
Random quote: "Freedom is not worth having if it does not connote freedom to err." - Mahatma Gandhi |