We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Civil Liberties Act of 3051
Details
Submitted by[?]: Hutorian Conservative Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 3052
Description[?]:
| Act to restore more lost liberties to the people of Hutori. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Displays of public affection and obscenity laws.
Old value:: All public displays of affection are illegal.
Current: There are no laws regarding obscene public acts.
Proposed: Sexual intercourse is illegal in public.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Government policy on sexual relations.
Old value:: Heterosexual relationships only are legal for consenting adults.
Current: Sexual relations of all types are legal for consenting adults.
Proposed: Sexual relations of all types are legal for consenting adults.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 02:19:14, December 27, 2010 CET | From | Labour Party | To | Debating the Civil Liberties Act of 3051 |
| Message | Robert Mandleson, Minister for internal affairs; Mr Speaker, we welcome this move. We ask, however, why the opposition regard these personal freedoms as important and not the choice of a person to kill or not... |
| Date | 23:36:32, December 27, 2010 CET | From | Hutorian Conservative Party | To | Debating the Civil Liberties Act of 3051 |
| Message | Rt Hon Viscount Holding MP, Leader of the Opposition, Mr Speaker, does the government not regard this as important? The idea behind this Act is to allow people to act freely in public and not just in their own private residence. The NSC is reforming civil liberties as it appears the Labour government is busy reforming other sectors of the Hutori. We ask the government in what context are their remarks made about the choice of a person to kill or not? |
| Date | 23:39:34, December 27, 2010 CET | From | Labour Party | To | Debating the Civil Liberties Act of 3051 |
| Message | Robert Mandleson, Minister for internal affairs; Conscription, Mr Speaker. |
| Date | 23:47:33, December 27, 2010 CET | From | Hutorian Conservative Party | To | Debating the Civil Liberties Act of 3051 |
| Message | Rt Hon Viscount Holding MP, Leader of the Opposition, Mr Speaker, we thank the government for the clarification. Regarding NSC policy towards conscription we believe that when called upon to serve ones country the people should. The defending of our nation is imperative - isnt it? Would the government not agree? Conscription means that our armies are maximised and ready for all outcomes. It acts as a deterrent for war and makes Hutori appear as a strong nation on the international stage. Mr Speaker, the NSC policy on conscription is one that puts the safety of the Hutorian state first and i believe lal our citizens would lose this minor liberty to ensure the safety of our great nation. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes |
Total Seats: 391 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: When forming a cabinet, try to include as few parties as possible, while still obtaining a majority of the seats. |
| Random quote: "The key to understanding the American system is to imagine that you have the power to make nearly any law you want, but your worst enemy will be the one to enforce it." - Rick Cook |