We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Protocol extending the Act Establishing the Right to Privacy
Details
Submitted by[?]: Radical Freedom Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 2144
Description[?]:
| This bill will extend the Act Establishing the Right to Privacy to include the confidentiality of letters as an inviolable right which is part of the Right to Privacy. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The confidentiality of letters and correspondence.
Old value:: The confidentiality of letters is inviolable, but the justice dept. can violate it in extreme situations.
Current: The confidentiality of letters is inviolable, but the justice dept. can violate it in extreme situations.
Proposed: The confidentiality of letters is inviolable.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 18:24:41, November 15, 2005 CET | From |  RSDP - Democratic Front | To | Debating the Protocol extending the Act Establishing the Right to Privacy |
| Message | Against, we must have a police force able to actually fight crime. |
| Date | 22:16:03, November 15, 2005 CET | From | Radical Freedom Party | To | Debating the Protocol extending the Act Establishing the Right to Privacy |
| Message | Other opinions? |
| Date | 22:56:20, November 15, 2005 CET | From | Freedom Party | To | Debating the Protocol extending the Act Establishing the Right to Privacy |
| Message | If intercepting and opening a letter can stop terrorist attacks i am up for violation in extreme situations. However, the likelihood of terrorists using letters is not high. |
| Date | 18:48:34, November 16, 2005 CET | From | Libertarian Alcoholic Party II | To | Debating the Protocol extending the Act Establishing the Right to Privacy |
| Message | We support this noble pro-HUMAN RIGHTS bill. Who could oppose such a HUMAN RIGHTS bill? |
| Date | 22:53:57, November 17, 2005 CET | From | Freedom Party | To | Debating the Protocol extending the Act Establishing the Right to Privacy |
| Message | lol |
| Date | 20:51:29, November 20, 2005 CET | From | Libertarian Alcoholic Party II | To | Debating the Protocol extending the Act Establishing the Right to Privacy |
| Message | Sorry about that little RSDP-jab there. I'm sure they're going to support, what with them being far more committed to human rights than anyone on the capitalist bloc and everything. |
| Date | 22:00:03, November 20, 2005 CET | From | RSDP - Democratic Front | To | Debating the Protocol extending the Act Establishing the Right to Privacy |
| Message | Human rights also include the right not to be subject to crimes and terrorist attacks just because the police can't even intercept a simple letter in extreme situations. So please take your bullshit and leave. |
| Date | 22:00:30, November 20, 2005 CET | From | RSDP - Democratic Front | To | Debating the Protocol extending the Act Establishing the Right to Privacy |
| Message | We also note the flip-flopping of the Freedom Party. |
| Date | 23:23:43, November 20, 2005 CET | From | Liberal Imperialist Party | To | Debating the Protocol extending the Act Establishing the Right to Privacy |
| Message | Following your logic the following statement is true: Human rights =/= the right to have crap parties like the RSDP. You're banned. The fact that this is illogical, partisan crap doesnt factor into it at all, of course :roll: |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 339 | ||||||
| no |
Total Seats: 260 | ||||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Players must never be asked for their Particracy password. This includes Moderation; a genuine Moderator will never ask for your password. |
| Random quote: "Democracy is a pathetic belief in the collective wisdom of individual ignorance." - H. L. Mencken |