We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Removing Government Interferance Bill
Details
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 2141
Description[?]:
| There is no need for the government to interfere in the following areas. Business and the Armed Forces will always choose the best men, otherwise it harms themselves, therefore they do not need any form of government intereferance. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Discrimination in the military on grounds of race/religion.
Old value:: Any adult citizen can serve in the military, discrimination for racial or religious reasons is prohibited.
Current: Candidates must be of a certain race/religion to be armed or take part in combat.
Proposed: The government does not interfere with the military over who can serve in it.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Positive discrimination.
Old value:: No form of positive discrimination is permitted.
Current: The government discriminates against minorities in its hiring.
Proposed: The government does not regulate hiring policies.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 18:41:57, November 15, 2005 CET | From | Aldurian Libertarian Socialist Party | To | Debating the Removing Government Interferance Bill |
| Message | When the conservatives forces proposes that the government should not even take care of ITS business it shows that we've hit the bottom of the lassez-faire ideology. |
| Date | 18:43:25, November 15, 2005 CET | From | Aldurian Libertarian Socialist Party | To | Debating the Removing Government Interferance Bill |
| Message | More over, these law protect fundamental rights, we would oppose this bill even if it had no implication about the autority of the government over the military. |
| Date | 03:18:22, November 16, 2005 CET | From | New Aldurian Conservative Party | To | Debating the Removing Government Interferance Bill |
| Message | Article 1: We have reservations about this. Article 2: Tenatively, yes. |
| Date | 06:33:33, November 16, 2005 CET | From | Market Socialist Party | To | Debating the Removing Government Interferance Bill |
| Message | We will support only article two because this is pertaining to the private sector and we believe that the private sector should be able to do what ever they want (so long as it doesn't infringe on the rights of others). However, because the government exists for all its citizens there should be laws in effect to make certain that there is no discrimination. We will vote for this only if you remove article one.. And in the future could you please allow for at least 6-12 hours debate time? |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 0 | ||||||
| no |
Total Seats: 401 | ||||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Particracy isn't just a game, it also has a forum, where players meet up to discuss role-playing, talk about in-game stuff, run their own newspaper or organisation and even discuss non-game and real-life issues! Check it out: http://forum.particracy.net/ |
| Random quote: "He who wishes to be obeyed must know how to command." - Niccolo Machiavelli |