We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Nuclear weaponry in warfare
Details
Submitted by[?]: Bürgerlichen Soziale Union
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 3054
Description[?]:
| Nuclear Weaponry should not be used for any reason, even we don't agree to that. Although it can be and we are excused from using it when a enemy attacks us with biological/chemical/nuclear weaponry. Therefore, we could counter-attack. Although it is true "fighting force with force is never a good thing" in warfare it is a neccesity, while we must think of out citizens. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the use of nuclear weaponry in warfare.
Old value:: The nation shall never use nuclear weapons in warfare.
Current: The nation shall never use nuclear weapons in warfare unless another nation uses them first.
Proposed: The nation reserves the right to nuclear weapons in retaliation to a nuclear, chemical or biological attack.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 12:02:57, December 31, 2010 CET | From | Education Party | To | Debating the Nuclear weaponry in warfare |
| Message | Until a technology for safe, permanent containment of radioactive wastes has been developed and tested, it is irresponsible to continue producing nuclear weapons. The moratorium on nuclear power takes on an added element of urgency when the careless record of the government in handling wastes is taken into consideration. |
| Date | 04:32:49, January 01, 2011 CET | From | . | To | Debating the Nuclear weaponry in warfare |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, The use of nuclear weapons is profoundly immoral, which means the construction and ownership of such weapons is also immoral. We cannot see any benefit in the use of these hideous weapons. A world scarred by the fall-out of nuclear warfare would be a much poorer place to live in. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes |
Total Seats: 321 | |||
| no |
Total Seats: 179 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: In Culturally Protected nations, special care must be taken to ensure realism is maintained when role-playing a government controlled by an ethnic and/or religious minority. If it is to be supposed that this government is supported by a majority of the population, then this should be plausibly and sufficiently role-played. The burden of proof is on the player or players role-playing such a regime to demonstrate that it is being done realistically |
| Random quote: "If it were proved to me that in making war, my ideal had a chance of being realized, I would still say 'No' to war, for one does not create human society on mounds of corpses." - Louis Lecoin |