We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Ratification of the NATIONALIST FREEDOM UNION
Details
Submitted by[?]: Covenanters (IA)
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill proposes for the ratification of a treaty. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 2142
Description[?]:
This bill asks for the ratification of the <a href="viewtreaty.php?treatyid=132">NATIONALIST FREEDOM UNION</a>. If this treaty is ratified, it becomes binding and will define national law. |
Proposals
Article 1
Ratify the NATIONALIST FREEDOM UNION.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 00:43:01, November 16, 2005 CET | From | United Conservative Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the NATIONALIST FREEDOM UNION |
Message | What is this? We need a summary of the provisions of the bill/treaty. Your links don't work. |
Date | 02:23:07, November 16, 2005 CET | From | Luthori Green Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the NATIONALIST FREEDOM UNION |
Message | I will not vote in favour of this anti-internationalist fear-mongering. |
Date | 08:33:46, November 16, 2005 CET | From | Covenanters (IA) | To | Debating the Ratification of the NATIONALIST FREEDOM UNION |
Message | Use the link in article 1, not the description. |
Date | 20:55:50, November 16, 2005 CET | From | Social Calvinist Unionist Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the NATIONALIST FREEDOM UNION |
Message | I cannot vote yes. This may be because I am from a diplomatic family and have seen death, destruction, rampant corruption, and torture with my own eyes, but if a government is not fit to rule it's own nation, and the people of the nation cannot replace it themselves, then it is the duty of the international community to do it for them. |
Date | 21:31:54, November 16, 2005 CET | From | Covenanters (IA) | To | Debating the Ratification of the NATIONALIST FREEDOM UNION |
Message | Like in Iraq? Where the UN did nothing so two sovereign states stepped in. |
Date | 04:48:46, November 17, 2005 CET | From | Luthori Green Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the NATIONALIST FREEDOM UNION |
Message | Well, there were more than two nation-states involved in the invasion, but under the NFU, if a similar thing happened, and Iraq was a member of the NFU, we would have to wage war on the invaders. |
Date | 13:25:59, November 17, 2005 CET | From | Luthori Green Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the NATIONALIST FREEDOM UNION |
Message | The United Countries will soon have twenty nations signed on, why not become the twenty-first, rather that join a tiny rag-tag protest group that stands for ignorance. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 207 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 380 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 163 |
Random fact: The people in your nation don't like inactive parties. When you often abstain from voting for a bill, they will dislike your party and your visibility to the electorate will decrease significantly. Low visibility will means you are likely to lose seats. So keep in mind: voting Yes or No is always better than Abstaining. |
Random quote: "Communism needs democracy like the human body needs oxygen." - Leon Trotsky |