Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: July 5475
Next month in: 00:40:33
Server time: 19:19:26, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (5): Aren | Arusu-Gad | Dx6743 | luthorian3059 | Xalvas | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Ratification of the NATIONALIST FREEDOM UNION

Details

Submitted by[?]: Covenanters (IA)

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill proposes for the ratification of a treaty. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: April 2142

Description[?]:

This bill asks for the ratification of the <a href="viewtreaty.php?treatyid=132">NATIONALIST FREEDOM UNION</a>. If this treaty is ratified, it becomes binding and will define national law.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date00:43:01, November 16, 2005 CET
FromUnited Conservative Party
ToDebating the Ratification of the NATIONALIST FREEDOM UNION
MessageWhat is this?

We need a summary of the provisions of the bill/treaty. Your links don't work.

Date02:23:07, November 16, 2005 CET
FromLuthori Green Party
ToDebating the Ratification of the NATIONALIST FREEDOM UNION
MessageI will not vote in favour of this anti-internationalist fear-mongering.

Date08:33:46, November 16, 2005 CET
FromCovenanters (IA)
ToDebating the Ratification of the NATIONALIST FREEDOM UNION
MessageUse the link in article 1, not the description.

Date20:55:50, November 16, 2005 CET
FromSocial Calvinist Unionist Party
ToDebating the Ratification of the NATIONALIST FREEDOM UNION
MessageI cannot vote yes. This may be because I am from a diplomatic family and have seen death, destruction, rampant corruption, and torture with my own eyes, but if a government is not fit to rule it's own nation, and the people of the nation cannot replace it themselves, then it is the duty of the international community to do it for them.

Date21:31:54, November 16, 2005 CET
FromCovenanters (IA)
ToDebating the Ratification of the NATIONALIST FREEDOM UNION
MessageLike in Iraq? Where the UN did nothing so two sovereign states stepped in.

Date04:48:46, November 17, 2005 CET
FromLuthori Green Party
ToDebating the Ratification of the NATIONALIST FREEDOM UNION
MessageWell, there were more than two nation-states involved in the invasion, but under the NFU, if a similar thing happened, and Iraq was a member of the NFU, we would have to wage war on the invaders.

Date13:25:59, November 17, 2005 CET
FromLuthori Green Party
ToDebating the Ratification of the NATIONALIST FREEDOM UNION
MessageThe United Countries will soon have twenty nations signed on, why not become the twenty-first, rather that join a tiny rag-tag protest group that stands for ignorance.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 207

no
    

Total Seats: 380

abstain
  

Total Seats: 163


Random fact: The people in your nation don't like inactive parties. When you often abstain from voting for a bill, they will dislike your party and your visibility to the electorate will decrease significantly. Low visibility will means you are likely to lose seats. So keep in mind: voting Yes or No is always better than Abstaining.

Random quote: "Communism needs democracy like the human body needs oxygen." - Leon Trotsky

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 58