We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Police Restriction Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Libertarian Socialist Party of Darnussia
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 3066
Description[?]:
| This simply reduces wasted time by police officers guarding government buildings as if they were more important than others. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy towards police presence.
Old value:: Presence of the police is left to the local governments.
Current: The police patrol public property at all times.
Proposed: The police do not actively patrol public property.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 23:39:56, January 23, 2011 CET | From | Liberty Party | To | Debating the Police Restriction Act |
| Message | I think this is meant to include all public property, mostly the streets |
| Date | 04:03:39, January 24, 2011 CET | From | Conservative Libertarian Party | To | Debating the Police Restriction Act |
| Message | It would yes, police would patrol everywhere that is not privately owned. |
| Date | 17:24:45, January 24, 2011 CET | From | Communist Party of Darnussia | To | Debating the Police Restriction Act |
| Message | Please note, otherwise I would be neutral, but I'm voting "no" for populist reasons. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes | Total Seats: 206 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 495 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Real-life places should not be referenced in Particracy. |
| Random quote: "We must face the fact that the preservation of individual freedom is incompatible with a full satisfaction of our views of distributive justice." - Friedrich August von Hayek |