We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Division of the Military and Police Act of 3064
Details
Submitted by[?]: Republican Party (RM)
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 3069
Description[?]:
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The nation's policy on the separation of the police and the military.
Old value:: A civilian police force is in place, backed up by the military.
Current: A civilian police force is in place and the military may be called in to help in serious emergencies.
Proposed: A civilian police force is in place and the military may be called in to help in serious emergencies.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 01:16:02, January 30, 2011 CET | From | Plaid Geidwadol Traddodiadol (PGT) | To | Debating the Division of the Military and Police Act of 3064 |
Message | Mr. Speaker, How would we be able to confront a terrorist threat or a heavily armed insurrection without the military backing up the police? I yield. |
Date | 01:39:26, January 30, 2011 CET | From | Republican Party (RM) | To | Debating the Division of the Military and Police Act of 3064 |
Message | Mr. Speaker, Since when has Aloria been threatened by terrorism, and why should we be? Do the CMP know something we do not? I yield. |
Date | 01:45:44, January 30, 2011 CET | From | Plaid Geidwadol Traddodiadol (PGT) | To | Debating the Division of the Military and Police Act of 3064 |
Message | Mr. Speaker, Prevention is better than a cure. Social unrest and instability, which would lead to anarchy, is the worst thing that could possibly happen. Death and destruction must be prevented. We are simply saying that terrorist attacks and heavily armed rebellion is a possibility, which is true for all nations. I yield. |
Date | 03:04:08, January 30, 2011 CET | From | Republican Party (RM) | To | Debating the Division of the Military and Police Act of 3064 |
Message | Mr. Speaker, The only armed rebellion would be caused by your party's undemocratic decision to install a monarchy. We feel this proposal would make Aloria less corrupt than it already is. I yield. |
Date | 03:53:04, January 30, 2011 CET | From | Christian Democratic Party | To | Debating the Division of the Military and Police Act of 3064 |
Message | Mr. Speaker, While we can see the merit of spacing the two apart, we feel a better compromise would be to allow the military to be called in to help during serious emergencies. If the law was changed to allow that, we will vote for it. I yield. |
Date | 05:18:28, January 30, 2011 CET | From | Plaid Geidwadol Traddodiadol (PGT) | To | Debating the Division of the Military and Police Act of 3064 |
Message | Mr. Speaker, What did we do that was undemocratic? The restoration of the monarchy and giving His Imperial Majesty and His Imperial Majesty's descendants certain powers was within our right and was a unanimous decision in Parliament. Please tell us where the corruption is? Has the CMP not worked with other parties? Has the CMP not compromised in order to preserve peace and stability in recognizing that it is the smallest party? From our point of view, there is no corruption. I yield. |
Date | 12:22:11, January 30, 2011 CET | From | Republican Party (RM) | To | Debating the Division of the Military and Police Act of 3064 |
Message | Mr. Speaker, Only unanimous because, at the time, the CMP had seized all power and had the support of its sister party, the Christian Democrats. The Republican Party will not allow this nation to be dominated by aristocracy and hereditary head of states who are not elected. We will alter this bill to the Christian Democrat's suggestion. I yield. |
Date | 15:12:04, January 30, 2011 CET | From | Plaid Geidwadol Traddodiadol (PGT) | To | Debating the Division of the Military and Police Act of 3064 |
Message | Mr. Speaker, The people did not have to vote for us, but they did. End of discussion. Every law that is passed is purely democratic. I yield. |
Date | 15:15:59, January 30, 2011 CET | From | Republican Party (RM) | To | Debating the Division of the Military and Police Act of 3064 |
Message | Mr. Speaker, The people had no other choice.. There was no other party to vote for to show their disapproval. We hope this stains your party for the length of its existance. I yield. |
Date | 15:27:29, January 30, 2011 CET | From | Plaid Geidwadol Traddodiadol (PGT) | To | Debating the Division of the Military and Police Act of 3064 |
Message | Mr. Speaker, The people did not have to vote, but they did. All people have a choice. They could have voted or stay home. I yield. |
Date | 15:50:09, January 30, 2011 CET | From | Christian Democratic Party | To | Debating the Division of the Military and Police Act of 3064 |
Message | Mr. Speaker, Please, we fine gentlemen should keep our fighting over election results out of our rule making body. i yield. |
Date | 15:56:31, January 30, 2011 CET | From | Plaid Geidwadol Traddodiadol (PGT) | To | Debating the Division of the Military and Police Act of 3064 |
Message | Mr. Speaker, I agree. Thank you for being the voice of reason. I yield. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||
yes |
Total Seats: 654 | ||
no | Total Seats: 96 | ||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Culturally Open nations can adopt advisory/non-enforceable Nation Descriptions. See http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=6242 |
Random quote: "Power always has to be kept in check; power exercised in secret, especially under the cloak of national security, is doubly dangerous." - William Proxmire |