Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: June 5475
Next month in: 01:45:00
Server time: 14:14:59, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): albaniansunited | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Public Ownership and Regulation of Natural Resources and Workforce

Details

Submitted by[?]: Socialist International

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: May 3077

Description[?]:

This bill is proposed as some of the defining features of SocIntern. We as a party feel that these issues are a major part of our government, and should be shifted into government control.

Articles 1,2,3,4,9, and 11 deal with shifting major natural resources into public ownership, to ensure that the people are best provided for. 9 specifically deals with ensuring protection of our natural resources.

Articles 5 and 8 serve to ensure a better society for our children. It is the SocIntern belief that children are the future and should be cared for.

Article 6 establishes a national health care system under the control of the government, ensuring public health is kept under the best possible control.

Articles 7 and 10 ensure that the workers of our nation are well-compensated for their work, and that corporations will be unable to have control of them. The worker is entitled to their fair share, and we seek to make sure they receive it.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date17:34:32, February 13, 2011 CET
FromLibertarian Left
ToDebating the Public Ownership and Regulation of Natural Resources and Workforce
MessageI'd be willing to get behind Articles 4 & 9 if you want to split them into a separate bill (not that it matters since we don't have the numbers). The rest of them are too heavily restrictive upon the market place and the choice of the consumer.

As the whole bill stands I'd have to vote no.

Date02:34:03, February 14, 2011 CET
FromLabor Party
ToDebating the Public Ownership and Regulation of Natural Resources and Workforce
MessageI agree with the LL on this. I'd vote yes for 4 &9, but this is overall too restrictive. It's better, perhaps, than what is in place now, but still not what the nation needs.

Date08:16:56, February 14, 2011 CET
FromUrban Party of Rutania
ToDebating the Public Ownership and Regulation of Natural Resources and Workforce
MessageThe National Party is opposed to any form of socialism and will vote "No".

Date08:39:26, February 14, 2011 CET
FromInfrastructure Party
ToDebating the Public Ownership and Regulation of Natural Resources and Workforce
MessageWe can not support this bill as it stands. It would be better to debate the various articles independently.

Date18:34:50, February 15, 2011 CET
FromLiberal Democtatic Party
ToDebating the Public Ownership and Regulation of Natural Resources and Workforce
MessageAs it stands we of the Liberal Democratic Party cannot support this bill.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 0

no
     

Total Seats: 675

abstain
  

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: Use a valid e-mail address for your Particracy account. If the e-mail address you entered does not exist, your account may be suspected of multi-accounting and inactivated.

Random quote: "I am strongly in favour of using poisoned gas against uncivilised tribes." - Winston Churchill

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 116