We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Resident Restriction Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Labour Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 3077
Description[?]:
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government policy concerning immigration.
Old value:: Everyone is allowed to reside permanently in this nation.
Current: There are quotas based on nationality to determine how many foreigners may reside permanently in this nation.
Proposed: Quotas are based on individual applicant's qualifications.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 06:56:02, February 16, 2011 CET | From | Labour Party | To | Debating the Resident Restriction Act |
Message | Mr Speaker, We cannot be letting people coming into the country however they like, what if they're terrorists or mass murderers who come across to Aloria because they know that we are soft on immigration. I say it is time to get tough, anyone can come in, but their status needs to be reviewed and if they're seen as a potential risk to society, then they cannot come in, its as simple as that. On the other hand, if they have a good record, then they can come in. If you have nothing to hide and have done nothing wrong, then I do not see why we should be worried about getting tough on people who have. |
Date | 21:04:09, February 16, 2011 CET | From | The Liberal Feminist Party | To | Debating the Resident Restriction Act |
Message | People have the right to live in this country if they choose to do so. Just because someone has a record does not mean they are a terrorist. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes |
Total Seats: 608 | |||
no | Total Seats: 142 | |||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Party organizations are eligible for deletion if they are over 50 in-game years old, do not have at least 1 active member or are historically significant and possess historically significant information. |
Random quote: "Conservative, n: A statesman who is enamored of existing evils, as distinguished from the Liberal who wishes to replace them with others." - Ambrose Bierce |