Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: January 5461
Next month in: 00:21:37
Server time: 19:38:22, March 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (5): jamescfm-kaf | reformist2024 | starfruit | Tayes3 | wstodden2 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Resident Restriction Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Labour Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: September 3077

Description[?]:

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date06:56:02, February 16, 2011 CET
FromLabour Party
ToDebating the Resident Restriction Act
MessageMr Speaker,

We cannot be letting people coming into the country however they like, what if they're terrorists or mass murderers who come across to Aloria because they know that we are soft on immigration. I say it is time to get tough, anyone can come in, but their status needs to be reviewed and if they're seen as a potential risk to society, then they cannot come in, its as simple as that. On the other hand, if they have a good record, then they can come in. If you have nothing to hide and have done nothing wrong, then I do not see why we should be worried about getting tough on people who have.

Date21:04:09, February 16, 2011 CET
FromThe Liberal Feminist Party
ToDebating the Resident Restriction Act
MessagePeople have the right to live in this country if they choose to do so. Just because someone has a record does not mean they are a terrorist.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 608

no
  

Total Seats: 142

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: RP laws follow the same passing rules as in-game variable laws. Laws that are not of a constitutional nature require a simple majority "Yes" vote from active parties currently holding seats. Laws that are of a constitutional nature require a 2/3 majority "Yes" vote from active parties currently holding seats. RP laws may be abolished a simple majority vote this applies to ANY RP law.

    Random quote: "Dictators ride to and fro upon tigers which they dare not dismount. And the tigers are getting hungry." - Winston Churchill

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 48