Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5573
Next month in: 00:03:31
Server time: 19:56:28, November 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): ImportantGuy | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Devolution Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Democratic Catholic Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: November 3077

Description[?]:

For a moderate federalism and a better unification of our Nation

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date15:45:52, February 16, 2011 CET
From Labour Party
ToDebating the Devolution Act
MessageWe believe in a market economy, but this bill would be laughable were it not so dangerous. This bill is a take-no-prisoners assault on some of the laws that make Solentia great. It's an assault on the working class, on our infrastructure, and on our future.

There is a place for the market and a place
For the government, and sometimes, there is a place
For the two to cooperate.

Devolving highways? Give me
A break. The FHE has abandoned any shred
Of sanity and seriousness it had left.

Vote no on this monstrosity. Protect Solentia from
The FHE's madness.

Senator Ryan Fay
SDP Chancellor

Date18:56:28, February 17, 2011 CET
From Federal Independent Party
ToDebating the Devolution Act
MessageWhile we are very much opposed to the devolution of highways as it is a disastrous idea, the remainder of the bill has potential to be beneficial. Therefore should this bill pass, we will introduce a bill re-nationalizing the highway system.

FIP Minority Leader Jay Thesmond

Date19:49:16, February 17, 2011 CET
From Labour Party
ToDebating the Devolution Act
MessageThe voting period for this bill is almost at an end. We hope that it goes down in flames, as it will surely go down in history as one of the most dangerous pieces of legislation to ever be proposed before this Senate.

Senator Ryan Fay
SDP Chancellor

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 200

no
    

Total Seats: 202

abstain
 

Total Seats: 23


Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context.

Random quote: "There are many men of principle in both parties in America, but there is no party of principle." - Alexis de Tocqueville

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 64