Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: August 5575
Next month in: 03:46:22
Server time: 12:13:37, November 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: New Assembly Name

Details

Submitted by[?]: Conservative Liberal Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: August 2153

Description[?]:

We propose to change our current Legislative Assembly to another name. Our suggestion is to use the House of Lords.
BUT we can still negotiate the name.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date08:30:02, November 17, 2005 CET
FromKeymon Ruling Party
ToDebating the New Assembly Name
MessageSorry, but HoL makes no sense.....

Date17:38:32, November 17, 2005 CET
FromConservative Liberal Party
ToDebating the New Assembly Name
MessageOther suggestions:

House of Commons
Ducal Chamber
Ducal Forum

Date09:19:57, November 18, 2005 CET
FromKeymon Ruling Party
ToDebating the New Assembly Name
MessageHow about something archaic? 'Forum for political discussion', 'Senatum Imperialis', and well so on? Or you could just go for plain old 'Parliament'.

Oh, and what do people think about buying a second region? I'd be willing to contribute our entire GDP for a year to get ourselves a larger tax base....

Date19:18:08, November 18, 2005 CET
FromConservative Liberal Party
ToDebating the New Assembly Name
MessageOh thank God, yes!

Date03:20:10, November 25, 2005 CET
FromLiberal-Conservative Progressive Party
ToDebating the New Assembly Name
MessageHow much is a second region?

We are fond of house of assembly

Date18:39:13, November 25, 2005 CET
FromRed Star Movement
ToDebating the New Assembly Name
MessageOu current name will suffice I think.

Date04:54:45, December 09, 2005 CET
FromConservative Liberal Party
ToDebating the New Assembly Name
MessageThis has been here for a while so I'll just throw it in straight to voting.

Date09:48:55, December 09, 2005 CET
FromKeymon Ruling Party
ToDebating the New Assembly Name
MessageMakes me thin of the toilet, but well what the heck eh?

Date17:31:14, December 09, 2005 CET
FromConservative Liberal Party
ToDebating the New Assembly Name
MessageHaha... Hope the RSM votes yes.

Date22:01:47, December 09, 2005 CET
FromRed Star Movement
ToDebating the New Assembly Name
MessageMy vote makes no difference, so I will ponder it...:P

Date22:02:15, December 09, 2005 CET
FromRed Star Movement
ToDebating the New Assembly Name
MessageBy the way, how do you pronounce 'Ducal'?

Date17:00:59, December 10, 2005 CET
FromConservative Liberal Party
ToDebating the New Assembly Name
MessageYes RSM, your vote did matter............ errr...........

Ducal is pronounced Doo-kal.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 165

no
   

Total Seats: 134

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Parties have the ability to endorse another party's candidate for the Head of State election (if there is one). This adds a strategic element to the elections.

    Random quote: "Democracy is more dangerous than fire. Fire can't vote itself immune to water." - Michael Z. Williamson

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 65