We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Revocation of the Abolishment of the Hereditary Head of State Act of 1360
Details
Submitted by[?]: Ordo Illuminati Patricii
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 3082
Description[?]:
| 17 Years Ago, under the auspices of the now-defuct People's Caniopolis Party, revoked our ancient tradition regarding the Executive Structure of Our Republic and Empire, We of the Ordo Illuminati Patricii, seek a Restoration to our Constitutional Hereditary Regime. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Structure of the executive branch.
Old value:: The Head of State and Head of Government are two separate officials.
Current: The Head of State is hereditary and symbolic; the Head of Government chairs the cabinet.
Proposed: The Head of State is hereditary and symbolic; the Head of Government chairs the cabinet.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 11:56:21, February 21, 2011 CET | From | Ordo Illuminati Patricii | To | Debating the Revocation of the Abolishment of the Hereditary Head of State Act of 1360 |
| Message | In a salute to the people's unanymous majority, Pars Selucanium, we will likewise support our beloved Rector Imperiosis, Quintus Flavius Regilus, to the continuance of His Executive Imperial Office |
| Date | 13:53:34, February 21, 2011 CET | From | Ordo Illuminati Patricii | To | Debating the Revocation of the Abolishment of the Hereditary Head of State Act of 1360 |
| Message | Furthermore, we argue that this proposal is a restoration to the Original State of the Constitution as set forth at its Founding. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||
| yes | Total Seats: 0 | ||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | ||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 505 |
| Random fact: Characters are considered to be "owned" by the player who first mentioned or created them. In practice, players may share responsibility for role-playing a character, but ultimate authority rests with the owner. |
| Random quote: "A democracy that does not allow limits is not a democracy. Just as a limitless freedom is not freedom, but prevarication. Indeed, any theory of freedom worthy of this name is first of all a limit theory. If we extend the unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not willing to defend a tolerant society against the attacks of the intolerants, then the tolerants will be destroyed and the tolerance with them! Because, I ask to myself and ask you, given a certain system that we call democratic, which is today the best possible system to allow everyone to live freely and to be able to express their own thoughts, how can the same system admit attacks against its integrity? How can a system refuse the principle of the self-preservation? For this reason, to suppress the apologetics of thalerrism, it's for this reason that the exaltation of exegetes, principles, facts or methods of Thallerism and its anti-democratic aims does not constitute a violation of the freedom of manifestation of thought, but, on the contrary, the celebration of that freedom. The protection of the first premise on which a modern democratic system is based. And this premise must be safeguarded also and above all against itself and its abuses." ~ Malik Astori, Leadership of Liberty and Progress (Istalia) |