We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: RMS Compromise Bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: Anarcho-Primitivist Concern
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 3085
Description[?]:
| To quote: "Secure public ownership of: -Industry -Housing -land/Agriculture -health care -education -social services -utilities -transport" |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's stance on a salary cap.
Old value:: The government has no stance on a salary cap.
Current: Labour unions and organizations of employers negotiate a salary cap.
Proposed: Local governments decide on salary cap laws.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The government's position towards the stock exchange(s).
Old value:: Stock exchanges are allowed and are unregulated.
Current: Stock exchanges are allowed but are regulated.
Proposed: The government owns the stock exchange(s).
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Government policy on Democratic Workers' Councils.
Old value:: The government does not intervene in the marketplace with regards to Democratic Workers' Councils.
Current: The government does not intervene in the marketplace with regards to Democratic Workers' Councils.
Proposed: The government requires all businesses to be run by Democratic Workers' Councils.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 15:28:05, March 02, 2011 CET | From | Union Socialism Alliance | To | Debating the RMS Compromise Bill |
| Message | We feel that our current policy on healthcare falls under the "secure public ownership" banner. We could agree with the rest. |
| Date | 21:33:25, March 02, 2011 CET | From | Anarcho-Primitivist Concern | To | Debating the RMS Compromise Bill |
| Message | Allowing private clinics really doesn't quite match with securing public ownership. I mean, they are two entirely different things. |
| Date | 22:02:25, March 02, 2011 CET | From | Union Socialism Alliance | To | Debating the RMS Compromise Bill |
| Message | We were under the impression that secure public ownership meant that most of it is public, and with regulated and small private ones. If it means total public ownership, then we thought wrong. We ask if it can be proposed separately, as our party are still deliberating on the healthcare issue. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 472 | |||||
| no | Total Seats: 216 | |||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 62 |
| Random fact: Zardugal is a nation based on the old Byzantine Empire, with a modern twist and the Esperanto language. Zardugal is located on the continent of Majatra. |
| Random quote: "Sometimes democracy must be bathed in blood." - Augusto Pinochet |