We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: State Industry Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Anarcho-Primitivist Concern
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 3089
Description[?]:
x |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government policy on industry and subsidies to industrial operations.
Old value:: Certain industries are owned by the state, all others are under private ownership.
Current: The government acts as an investor of last resort, by nationalizing failing industries that provide vital goods or services.
Proposed: All industry is owned and operated by the state.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 00:30:09, March 13, 2011 CET | From | Lyika ati Isọdọtun | To | Debating the State Industry Act |
Message | What happened to that compromise? |
Date | 00:37:51, March 13, 2011 CET | From | Union Socialism Alliance | To | Debating the State Industry Act |
Message | The Compromise advocates secure public ownership of the industries. |
Date | 11:51:41, March 13, 2011 CET | From | Anarcho-Primitivist Concern | To | Debating the State Industry Act |
Message | The Mixed Economy Act happened to it. The IEF voted against their compromise commitments in education, health, industry, agriculture banking and (I believe) the stock market. We're happy to be in government with you because it is best for the country, but we don't feel that the agreement reached has been upheld. |
Date | 11:56:44, March 13, 2011 CET | From | Anarcho-Primitivist Concern | To | Debating the State Industry Act |
Message | That said, we do note that the USA actually are keeping to their agreements. We'll continue to take our commitments into consideration for their sake. |
Date | 14:07:05, March 13, 2011 CET | From | SCI Libertarian-Socialist Syndicate (LL) | To | Debating the State Industry Act |
Message | "The IEF voted against their compromise commitments in education, health, industry, agriculture banking and (I believe) the stock market." HEY NOW! I NEVER SUPPORTED THE COMPROMISE! I voted exactly how I stated that I would vote. So, do not say that I voted against any "committments"! |
Date | 14:28:19, March 13, 2011 CET | From | Union Socialism Alliance | To | Debating the State Industry Act |
Message | The IEF meaning the IMC and AL, even if the IMC pulled themselves out of it, the AL did support some anti-compromise legislation. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 409 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 341 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Particracy is completely free! If you want to support the game financially, feel free to make a small donation to the lievenswouter@gmail.com Paypal account. |
Random quote: "A politician who is poor is a poor politician." - Carlos Hank Gonzalez |