Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: July 5475
Next month in: 03:42:01
Server time: 16:17:58, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): HopesFor | Kubrick2 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Private Television Act.

Details

Submitted by[?]: Liberal-Progressive Union

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: January 2143

Description[?]:

This bill allows for all television ownership to be operated by private
media. This allows the government to partially own radio, while
allowing the privatisation of television.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date01:06:30, November 18, 2005 CET
From Liberal-Progressive Union
ToDebating the Private Television Act.
MessageA compromise between the two forms of media.

Date19:52:03, November 18, 2005 CET
From We Say So! Party
ToDebating the Private Television Act.
MessageHow is this a compromise? A compromise between the two forms of media, using the complete privatisation of one, would mean the complete nationalisation of the other. As is, private companies would own all of one area and still be able to compete in another.
The current law is the best compromise as it allows for both private and publically operated stations to operate side-by-side, what better compromise can there be?

Date20:08:45, November 18, 2005 CET
From United Blobs
ToDebating the Private Television Act.
MessageI believe the "compromise" is that they aren't trying to do anything about radio.

Date09:36:31, November 19, 2005 CET
From Liberal-Progressive Union
ToDebating the Private Television Act.
MessageThe "compromise" passed! Despite the patronizing words of the opposition who hold the parties who "think" and have different "opinions" other than their own in such low esteem.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 167

no
    

Total Seats: 127

abstain
  

Total Seats: 106


Random fact: The people in your nation don't like inactive parties. When you often abstain from voting for a bill, they will dislike your party and your visibility to the electorate will decrease significantly. Low visibility will means you are likely to lose seats. So keep in mind: voting Yes or No is always better than Abstaining.

Random quote: "Politics is for the present, but an equation is for eternity." - Albert Einstein

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 55