We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: protecting our forests
Details
Submitted by[?]: Dark Templar (LL)
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 3095
Description[?]:
| gfjghk |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Forest management.
Old value:: There is a national agency which owns all forests, but subcontracts the work to private companies.
Current: Local governments may set up forestry agencies. Where they do not, forestry is on a commercial basis.
Proposed: There is a national agency which owns and manages all forest land.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning forest protection.
Old value:: Forests are protected. Logging is allowed by licence only.
Current: Forests are protected. Logging is allowed by licence only.
Proposed: Forests have strictly enforced protection. Felling is limited to fire breaks.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 19:49:27, March 23, 2011 CET | From | Union Socialism Alliance | To | Debating the protecting our forests |
| Message | We are inclined to agree on the first article, but not on the second one. |
| Date | 20:02:07, March 23, 2011 CET | From | SCI Libertarian-Socialist Syndicate (LL) | To | Debating the protecting our forests |
| Message | We can't agree to either. |
| Date | 21:42:17, March 23, 2011 CET | From | Ikradon Megacorporation | To | Debating the protecting our forests |
| Message | no to both. |
| Date | 02:42:35, March 24, 2011 CET | From | Lyika ati Isọdọtun | To | Debating the protecting our forests |
| Message | This bill isn't worth the paper it's printed on...which ironically would become even more true if this bill were to pass.... ;) |
| Date | 02:44:22, March 24, 2011 CET | From | Union Socialism Alliance | To | Debating the protecting our forests |
| Message | Well, the articles swapped places, so for the record, we agree with the national forestry management proposal, but not with the felling and logging restrictions. |
| Date | 16:31:30, March 24, 2011 CET | From | Art & Labour | To | Debating the protecting our forests |
| Message | Veto. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes | Total Seats: 177 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 443 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 130 |
| Random fact: Make sure your nation casts its nominations in Particracy's very own Security Council elections! For more information, see http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=26&t=8453 |
| Random quote: "The use of solar energy has not been opened up because the oil industry does not own the sun." - Ralph Nader |