We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Deregulation Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Highazhell Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 3098
Description[?]:
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning genetically modified (GM) crops.
Old value:: All activities related to production, selling or researching of GM crops are allowed.
Current: All activities related to production, selling or researching of GM crops are allowed.
Proposed: There is no policy concerning GM crops.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy with respect to polygamy.
Old value:: The government does not recognise polygamous relationships.
Current: Polygamous marriages are accorded equal recognition to monogamous marriages.
Proposed: There is no explicit government policy on polygamy.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 17:03:53, March 27, 2011 CET | From | Rutanian Supremacist League | To | Debating the Deregulation Act |
Message | The Horowitz Party are curious to know whether the Highazhell Party created long, heterogeneous bills to coerce other members of this assembly into voting contrary to their beliefs. Whether to Highazhell party did it to confuse the visibility of other parties and set up a vote grab of their own. Whether the Highazhell party did it out of sheer laziness. Or whether the Horowitz Party is showing contempt for the members of this assembly. The Horowitz Party advises the Highazhell Party to partition their proposals into more homogeneous bills, so that assembly proceedings may proceed more smoothly. |
Date | 17:05:40, March 27, 2011 CET | From | Rutanian Supremacist League | To | Debating the Deregulation Act |
Message | OCC: Previous post is now defunct because of an egregious typing error. IC: The Horowitz Party are curious to know whether the Highazhell Party created long, heterogeneous bills to coerce other members of this assembly into voting contrary to their beliefs. Whether to Highazhell party did it to confuse the visibility of other parties and set up a vote grab of their own. Whether the Highazhell party did it out of sheer laziness. Or whether the Highazhell Party is showing contempt for the members of this assembly. The Horowitz Party advises the Highazhell Party to partition their proposals into more homogeneous bills, so that assembly proceedings may proceed more smoothly. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||
yes |
Total Seats: 295 | ||
no | Total Seats: 380 | ||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: The use of proxy servers makes it impossible to detect multiing and is therefore forbidden. Players who access Particracy through a proxy will have their accounts inactivated. |
Random quote: "Before all else, be armed." - Niccolo Machiavelli |