We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: LL Cabinet Proposal of December 3097
Details
Submitted by[?]: Dark Templar (LL)
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 3099
Description[?]:
| Proposing a Cabinet |
Proposals
Article 1
The responsibilites of Head of Government will be conducted by the Dark Templar (LL)
Article 2
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the Marxist-Leninist Party of Ikradon (LL)
Article 3
The responsibilites of Food and Agriculture will be conducted by the Marxist-Leninist Party of Ikradon (LL)
Article 4
The responsibilites of Environment and Tourism will be conducted by the Anarcho-Primitivist Concern
Article 5
The responsibilites of Trade and Industry will be conducted by the Marxist-Leninist Party of Ikradon (LL)
Article 6
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the Dark Templar (LL)
Article 7
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the Marxist-Leninist Party of Ikradon (LL)
Article 8
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the Marxist-Leninist Party of Ikradon (LL)
Article 9
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the Anarcho-Primitivist Concern
Article 10
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the Anarcho-Primitivist Concern
Article 11
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the Dark Templar (LL)
Article 12
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the Dark Templar (LL)
Article 13
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the Dark Templar (LL)
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 01:55:26, March 30, 2011 CET | From | Union Socialism Alliance | To | Debating the LL Cabinet Proposal of December 3097 |
| Message | Disappointed, yet not surprised, as the DT chose for an all-LL cabinet. I still had hope they could be a little like IEF on the compromising area. Fair enough, as chancellor, I find this a suitable cabinet. Chancellor Cdr. Jean Shepard |
| Date | 05:07:36, March 30, 2011 CET | From | Lyika ati Isọdọtun | To | Debating the LL Cabinet Proposal of December 3097 |
| Message | Considering the IEF vaulted you into power for two consecutive terms, one would have hoped that you would have more vigorously defended the value of compromise, Chancellor Shepard. |
| Date | 13:27:43, March 30, 2011 CET | From | Union Socialism Alliance | To | Debating the LL Cabinet Proposal of December 3097 |
| Message | The LL, and specifically the DT and CFP, has repeatedly shown their disdain for compromise. The RMS has shown it would compromise, but it remains to be seen what they'd do. But the results ultimately shows the DT as the biggest party, and the biggest gainer. And with the CFP coming in second, and knowing that both part, specially the DT, never likes to compromise, I think that this is a suitable government. The people needs a government, and compromising with the DT would take too long, and would ultimately end in nothing, with the DT unwilling to budge on any issue. I stand by my decision, even if it means losing support. Chancellor Cdr. Jean Shepard |
| Date | 16:43:33, March 30, 2011 CET | From | Lyika ati Isọdọtun | To | Debating the LL Cabinet Proposal of December 3097 |
| Message | The current government retains a majority--although seats should be redistributed to reflect new political realities. |
| Date | 16:50:02, March 30, 2011 CET | From | Lyika ati Isọdọtun | To | Debating the LL Cabinet Proposal of December 3097 |
| Message | And if the Chancellor feels that being governed by a cult and a violently obstinate party is a "suitable government," then his principles are even more baseless than we had thought. Have a backbone, Mister Chancellor! |
| Date | 16:51:32, March 30, 2011 CET | From | Lyika ati Isọdọtun | To | Debating the LL Cabinet Proposal of December 3097 |
| Message | Ahh, wait, scratch the majority bit. We thought the RM-S had been included in the last compromise cabinet. |
| Date | 21:37:33, March 30, 2011 CET | From | Marxist-Leninist Party of Ikradon (LL) | To | Debating the LL Cabinet Proposal of December 3097 |
| Message | We are fine with Compromise as long as DWC is maintained. |
| Date | 22:34:18, March 30, 2011 CET | From | Union Socialism Alliance | To | Debating the LL Cabinet Proposal of December 3097 |
| Message | Would the LL look into finding coalition partners from outside of the LL? It would be very much appreciated and shall show the unity of our nation's politics. |
| Date | 06:03:38, March 31, 2011 CET | From | Dark Templar (LL) | To | Debating the LL Cabinet Proposal of December 3097 |
| Message | We feel that Ikradon needs a LL government to help fix some of the damages caused by capitalism. |
| Date | 15:18:25, March 31, 2011 CET | From | Union Socialism Alliance | To | Debating the LL Cabinet Proposal of December 3097 |
| Message | There hasn't been any capitalism in Ikradon.. |
| Date | 17:30:34, March 31, 2011 CET | From | Art & Labour | To | Debating the LL Cabinet Proposal of December 3097 |
| Message | We did sweet FA last term so we really have no idea what you're on about. |
| Date | 21:10:28, March 31, 2011 CET | From | Marxist-Leninist Party of Ikradon (LL) | To | Debating the LL Cabinet Proposal of December 3097 |
| Message | Is there private business in Ikradon? |
| Date | 23:13:57, March 31, 2011 CET | From | Union Socialism Alliance | To | Debating the LL Cabinet Proposal of December 3097 |
| Message | Associating private business with capitalism is like calling someone who owns a knife a murderer. Anything not owned by the government is private. So the media has been private for many years, with the support of the CFP. So yes, there has been private business, even under the LL, with the support of the LL and CFP. So technically that means that the CFP and LL are really capitalists! |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes | Total Seats: 326 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 371 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 53 |
| Random fact: Culturally Open nations can adopt advisory/non-enforceable Nation Descriptions. See http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=6242 |
| Random quote: "Nature provides a free lunch, but only if we control our appetites." - William Ruckelshaus |