We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Protection of Likatonia
Details
Submitted by[?]: AM Radical Libertarian Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 2144
Description[?]:
While we as a nation are lenient about who we allow into our country, there are and should bd some restrictions on entry. We must search out and remove those who attempt to avoid these restrictions. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change
The government's stance on illegal aliens.
Old value:: The government ignores illegal aliens.
Current: The government ignores illegal aliens.
Proposed: The government does not actively search for illegal aliens, but expels them from the country when discovered.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 10:33:32, November 20, 2005 CET | From | Likaton Fascist Front | To | Debating the Protection of Likatonia |
Message | PSS will support this. |
Date | 15:28:34, November 20, 2005 CET | From | Front for State Prosperity | To | Debating the Protection of Likatonia |
Message | The PCP will oppose. Free movement of labour improves the economy just like free movement of capital does. We should integrate not expel illegal aliens. Barring that our current stance of ignoring them is better than what you suggest. |
Date | 17:15:27, November 20, 2005 CET | From | Commonwealth Workers Army | To | Debating the Protection of Likatonia |
Message | The AAS will oppose. We should be hunting and removing these illegal drains on our economy and social care system. |
Date | 06:21:58, November 21, 2005 CET | From | Representative Party | To | Debating the Protection of Likatonia |
Message | We only support the removal of aliens who havecome toour country with malicious intent, such as terrorism, spying, or the smuggling of controlled goods such as firearms. |
Date | 18:20:04, November 21, 2005 CET | From | Commonwealth Workers Army | To | Debating the Protection of Likatonia |
Message | Does stealing our jobs count as malicious? |
Date | 12:34:18, November 22, 2005 CET | From | Front for State Prosperity | To | Debating the Protection of Likatonia |
Message | Errr, AAS, if that's your stance I think you should support this as a "step in the right direction" legislation. Of course I welcome your joining me in opposing if you should keep with opposing it. |
Date | 15:52:31, November 22, 2005 CET | From | Commonwealth Workers Army | To | Debating the Protection of Likatonia |
Message | The AAS intends to introduce some real proposals to deal with this problem. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 222 | ||||
no | Total Seats: 278 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: In cases where players introduce RP laws to a nation and then leave, Moderation reserves the discretion to declare the RP laws void if they appear to have fallen into disuse. In particular, please bear in mind that a player who is inexperienced with Particracy role-play and has joined a nation as the only party there should not generally be expected to abide by RP laws implemented by previous players who have been and left. |
Random quote: "Judge me all you want, just keep the verdict to yourself." - From a Winston advertisement |