We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Women in the Military
Details
Submitted by[?]: Skorovoi Independent Communist Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 2144
Description[?]:
| Women should not be permitted to serve on the front line as a soldier in any military force: 1. The heavy packs soldiers must wear are damaging to women's kidneys because of the different structure of the body. 2. Attatchment between men and women, marital or otherwise, may cause people to put their own lives and the lives of others in danger. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Women in the military.
Old value:: Women serve alongside men.
Current: Women serve alongside men.
Proposed: Women can only serve in non-battle positions.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 20:16:10, November 18, 2005 CET | From | Federalists Party | To | Debating the Women in the Military |
| Message | We support. |
| Date | 20:19:31, November 19, 2005 CET | From | Sol Party | To | Debating the Women in the Military |
| Message | We oppose. |
| Date | 18:22:39, November 20, 2005 CET | From | Libertarian Capitalist Party | To | Debating the Women in the Military |
| Message | Likewise oppose |
| Date | 09:52:15, November 22, 2005 CET | From | Free Democratic Party | To | Debating the Women in the Military |
| Message | "2. Attatchment between men and women, marital or otherwise, may cause people to put their own lives and the lives of others in danger." What about the attachment between homosexuals in the military? What about those between heterosexuals? There are always bonds in the military, sexual or otherwise |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes | Total Seats: 84 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 416 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: The people in your nation don't like inactive parties. When you often abstain from voting for a bill, they will dislike your party and your visibility to the electorate will decrease significantly. Low visibility will means you are likely to lose seats. So keep in mind: voting Yes or No is always better than Abstaining. |
| Random quote: "I think it's about time we voted for senators with breasts. After all, we've been voting for boobs long enough." - Clarie Sargent |