We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Administration Bill 3099
Details
Submitted by[?]: Kanjoran Conservative Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 3100
Description[?]:
| The current accumulation of proposals is not sufficient, we believe that political parties must be able to debate and introduce legislation more frequently. This is proving to be a limitation on the work parties can do. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The number of proposals a party can introduce per year (will be handed out as a monthly quota).
Old value:: 12
Current: 20
Proposed: 20
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The maximum proposal quota a party can accumulate.
Old value:: 5
Current: 50
Proposed: 20
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 03:55:48, April 03, 2011 CET | From | Action Canrillaise | To | Debating the Administration Bill 3099 |
| Message | We don't see a reason to raise such restrictions. It keeps the business of government manageable and will force parties to compromise/negotiate more. |
| Date | 16:02:08, April 03, 2011 CET | From | Kanjoran Conservative Party | To | Debating the Administration Bill 3099 |
| Message | The current restrictions leave parliament free of any work at all, that is you idea of manageable? We have to say no, no, no - more accountability, more representation and more government efficiency. Margaret Stonemason, KCP Leader |
| Date | 18:57:40, April 03, 2011 CET | From | Travail de l'Union Royaliste | To | Debating the Administration Bill 3099 |
| Message | We believe that something like this will not pass, it will not pass for the shake of the current government wanting to hold the power as long as possible. Restrictions like these present a problem to many parties but we will have to indeed deal with them. The Action Kanjorienne said its that "It keeps the business of government manageable". Anyhow, we would ask the Action Kanjorienne to either consider this proposal or at least another one which we could bring up. |
| Date | 11:58:17, April 04, 2011 CET | From | The Royal Union | To | Debating the Administration Bill 3099 |
| Message | We agree with Action Kanjorienne. What traditionally happens is the floor is literally flooded with bills without a lot of time to debate them properly. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 77 | |||
| no |
Total Seats: 24 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: http://www.fantasynamegenerators.com and http://www.behindthename.com/random are great resources for coming up with character names from unfamiliar cultures. |
| Random quote: "It is obvious that the laissez-faire ideology represents the interests of big business. For decades, the right-wing has opposed welfare programs and nationalised companies, in favour of big business disguised under 'economic liberty'." - Cecilia Xu, former Gaduri politician |