We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Cabinet Proposal of October 3102
Details
Submitted by[?]: Kanjoran Conservative Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 3103
Description[?]:
| Proposing a Cabinet |
Proposals
Article 1
The responsibilites of Head of Government will be conducted by the 
Kanjoran Conservative Party
Article 2
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the Kanjoran Conservative Party
Article 3
The responsibilites of Food and Agriculture will be conducted by the Kanjoran Conservative Party
Article 4
The responsibilites of Environment and Tourism will be conducted by the Action Canrillaise
Article 5
The responsibilites of Trade and Industry will be conducted by the Kanjoran Conservative Party
Article 6
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the Action Canrillaise
Article 7
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the Kanjoran Conservative Party
Article 8
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the Action Canrillaise
Article 9
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the Kanjoran Conservative Party
Article 10
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the Kanjoran Conservative Party
Article 11
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the Kanjoran Conservative Party
Article 12
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the Kanjoran Conservative Party
Article 13
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the Action Canrillaise
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 18:33:51, April 08, 2011 CET | From | Kanjoran Conservative Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of October 3102 |
| Message | This is our proposal for a grand coalition with the Kcp. Our terms with regard to vetoes and coalition support votes are the same. A party may veto one proposal in any bill. And it may also insist on coalition support for one bill during this government term, within an area of government for which it holds ministerial office. This should ensure parties work together but also remain true to themselves in certain key areas. Either the Ak accepts this or the RU supports the current generous offer. These are our choices. Margaret Stonemason |
| Date | 22:40:12, April 08, 2011 CET | From | Kanjoran Conservative Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of October 3102 |
| Message | In view of the fact that the AK, our perspective partners in government decided to introduce constitutional reform measures directly to the vote without even asking our view we feel we cannot work with you. Kanjor is not without government as your reform bill suggests but still in he control of the AK. If the RU does not wish to form a government with us we will leave Kanjor in the "capable" hands of the AK without this grand coalition. Margaret Stonemason KCP Leader |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||
| yes |
Total Seats: 37 | ||
| no | Total Seats: 64 | ||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Submitting a bill without any proposals in it will not attract or detract voters. It will not raise your visibility or change your political position. |
| Random quote: "Oh, judge, your damn laws: the good people don't need them and the bad people don't follow them so what good are they?" - Ammon Hennacy |