Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: May 5475
Next month in: 00:58:23
Server time: 11:01:36, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Cabinet Proposal of May 2143

Details

Submitted by[?]: New Aldurian Conservative Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: January 2144

Description[?]:

Proposing a Cabinet

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date00:34:34, November 20, 2005 CET
FromNew Aldurian Conservative Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of May 2143
MessageSeeing as the consensus proposal is flopping, we're proposing this to hopefully get a cabinet through so that there is -some- form of non-dysfunctional government.

Date00:37:50, November 20, 2005 CET
FromNew Aldurian Conservative Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of May 2143
MessageWe would like to note that, depending on your definition of the Aldurian "Right", we do have a majority, making a left-wing-based coalition unlikely. The setup is as follows:
Hard Right
JP: 81
"Mainline Right"
NACP: 92
Total: 173
Moderate Right
AM: 34
Total for whole right: 207
Possible Right; currently in coalition:
MSP: 46 seats
Total for all parties classifiable on the right: 253

Date01:42:16, November 20, 2005 CET
FromUnited Socialist Front
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of May 2143
MessageThe MSP isn't really part of the right.
They may agree to less regulation of the private sector, but that is in the hopes of the creation of a natural, independently made Socialism.
They are also very progressive and Liberal in their Civil Liberty dealings.

The JP is an interesting one.
They are more towards the keyneesian economics, but do seem to the right on certain Civil Liberties.
They could really go either way.

The NACP and AM are definitely Right Wing parties.

The advantage with the the JP included is a very narrow one. Still, an advantage none the less.

Date03:09:01, November 20, 2005 CET
FromAldurian Moderates
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of May 2143
MessageI'm glad the USF appears to know more about us than we do. Thanks so much for you classification. We are not right or left. If you check our rankings, we are moderate in four of the catagories. And we continually switch from restrictive leaning to premissive leaning on civil rights. You only claim that we are right because we see many of the laws of Alduria as disrespectful of people's wishes. We routinly are amazed at how the left can claim themselves to be champians of civil rights and then fail to support bills that actually attempt to make this noble goal a reality.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 207

no
  

Total Seats: 106

abstain
   

Total Seats: 88


Random fact: Cultural Protocols should generally be reflective of RP conducted within the nation and should not significantly alter or modify the ethnic, religious or linguistic composition without considerable and reasonable role-play or other justification.

Random quote: "Thousands of Zardic soldiers were sacrificed so that the Zardic government could gain control of a few buildings and Theodoro could pretend to be Augustus the Great. This is the kind of jingoistic ideology Zardugal would bring to the Security Council. They will throw countless lives away in pursuit of former glory." - Prince Akhaias, former Coburan royal

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 55