We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Agricultural Reform Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Union of Work-Shy Elements
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 2144
Description[?]:
| We simply feel this option is more suitable and desirable. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government agricultural and farming subsidies policy.
Old value:: Strategic crops are produced on State owned farms. All other produce is left to the Private sector.
Current: The government subsidises agriculture based on market demand for the crop being grown.
Proposed: Agricultural crops which are considered beneficial to the enviroment or to the continued ecological safety of the state are subsidized.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 19:08:57, November 20, 2005 CET | From | Party of Evil | To | Debating the Agricultural Reform Act |
| Message | Presumably this would put all agricultural production back into the private sector? We'll support that. |
| Date | 21:27:12, November 21, 2005 CET | From | Unio enim si quis Motus Populi | To | Debating the Agricultural Reform Act |
| Message | =( I'm conflicted. Yes, this does put all production back into private hands, somthing we don't want to see. On the other hand, we like this proposal. Ugh, not supported I guess. |
| Date | 21:32:27, November 21, 2005 CET | From | Radical Greens | To | Debating the Agricultural Reform Act |
| Message | I don't see how this puts all production back into private hands! But support it due to enviromental ideal behind it. |
| Date | 05:21:35, November 22, 2005 CET | From | Unio enim si quis Motus Populi | To | Debating the Agricultural Reform Act |
| Message | Production and Subsidization are two different things. This is taking away the government's role in the production of of stratigic crops, and exchanging it for giving farmers money to grow crops that are of environmental and ecological benefit. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 160 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 145 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Particracy does not allow real-life brand names (eg. Coca Cola, McDonalds, Microsoft). However, in the case of military equipment brand names it is permitted to use simple number-letter combinations (eg. T-90 and F-22) borrowed from real life, and also simple generic names, like those of animals (eg. Leopard and Jaguar). |
| Random quote: "The United States is in no sense founded upon the Christian doctrine." - George Washington |