We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Treason Act of 3132
Details
Submitted by[?]: Constitutionalist Imperial League (IA)
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 3133
Description[?]:
| Given the fact that during the failed September Revolution of 3096, the Empire of Luthori, our culture and our way of life is in mortal danger, it is imperative that the Diet, now composed mostly of Loyalists, take steps and enact laws that make it impossible for rebels to ever come succeed in another potential rebellion. For these laws to be successful, this act must be integrated into the Constitution. Thus, this is an amendment to the Constitution and requires 2/3 of the Diet to pass and be modified in any way. Henceforth: 1) While advocacy and speech is protected by the Common Bill of Rights, proposal of the legislative abolition of the monarchy in Luthori by any party is equivalent to the crime of treason and sedition. 2) While advocacy and speech is protected by the Common Bill of Rights, proposal of the installation of a communist or socialist government is equivalent to the crime of treason. 3) In addition to regular sanctions outlined by the Imperial Un-Luthorian Activities Committee, classification of a party as a "non-member" of the IULAC, as opposed to an "observer" or to a "member", strips said party of Constitutional and legal protection. 4) The Constitutional and Legal rights of IULAC member parties are to be respected at all times. |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 23:24:38, September 01, 2012 CET | From | Popular Party | To | Debating the Treason Act of 3132 |
| Message | s |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 146 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 53 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 2 |
| Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play. |
| Random quote: "It is better to abolish serfdom from above than wait for it to abolish itself from below." - Alexander II of Russia |