Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: May 5471
Next month in: 01:49:28
Server time: 10:10:31, April 18, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): Caoimhean | Freemarket21 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: A Bill for Visibility

Details

Submitted by[?]: Children of the Wrath

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: December 3129

Description[?]:

.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date18:31:15, May 31, 2011 CET
FromGroßmalivische Reichspartei
ToDebating the A Bill for Visibility
MessageWhy propose such big bills that parties are forced to vote against because they dont agree with all articles?

Date18:33:49, May 31, 2011 CET
FromChildren of the Wrath
ToDebating the A Bill for Visibility
MessageIn order to get our visibility up again.

Date18:36:31, May 31, 2011 CET
FromGroßmalivische Reichspartei
ToDebating the A Bill for Visibility
MessageYou could still do that by breaking it up... I'm going to abstain or else it'll mess up my own.

Date18:39:51, May 31, 2011 CET
FromChildren of the Wrath
ToDebating the A Bill for Visibility
MessageNot that this was the plan in the first place, but if you do that, it'll even pass. Well, to be completely honest, that's actually the outcome I didn't really want, since I was quite convinced that it would just be voted down.

Date18:40:49, May 31, 2011 CET
FromGroßmalivische Reichspartei
ToDebating the A Bill for Visibility
MessageWell, i'm not voting on it because it'll mess my party up. This is why bills containing different issues and stances should be broken up.

Date18:46:27, May 31, 2011 CET
FromChildren of the Wrath
ToDebating the A Bill for Visibility
MessageWell, not if I want them to get through.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 39

no

    Total Seats: 0

    abstain
     

    Total Seats: 36


    Random fact: Large scale RP planning (such as wars, regional/continental conflicts, economic collapse, etc.) should be planned (as best as it can be) and should have consent of a majority of players involved.

    Random quote: "It is obvious that the laissez-faire ideology represents the interests of big business. For decades, the right-wing has opposed welfare programs and nationalised companies, in favour of big business disguised under 'economic liberty'." - Cecilia Xu, former Gaduri politician

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 137