Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5475
Next month in: 01:48:24
Server time: 02:11:35, April 27, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): hexaus18 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Freedom Liberalization Act of February 3136

Details

Submitted by[?]: Beloved Freedom

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: September 3137

Description[?]:

Article 1 : All transmission and distribution should be owned by a single, government-owned company.
The power generation sector will be broken up broken up and come under private ownership, but some of power stations will be still owned by government to promote non-conventional energy.
Setting a new, private power station will be allowed.(original proposal)

Revised Proposal
Majority of power stations will be owned by government. Setting small, community-based private power stations will be allowed.


Article 2 : Allowing space-related activity to private sector.
Article 3 : Allowing private sports-clubs.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date19:29:37, June 14, 2011 CET
From Social Democratic Party (LL)
ToDebating the Freedom Liberalization Act of February 3136
MessageWe are in favor of Article 2, privatizing space exploration. It makes little sense when in deficit to spend government funds for the expensive thing that is space exploration.

We can't quite support Article 1, although we could support the less extreme move to allow small amounts of private generation, so that a small group of citizens might form a coop.

With respect to Article 3, we're in a strange position, as we don't feel that sports clubs should be federally run at all but rather devoluted to local governments.

On balance, if you changed Article 1 to allow only small scale private electrical generation, our party would support your bill.

Date19:36:44, June 14, 2011 CET
From Union Socialism Alliance
ToDebating the Freedom Liberalization Act of February 3136
MessageWe can only agree somewhat to the sports club. We would vote no in the current state.

Date06:27:12, June 15, 2011 CET
From SCI Libertarian-Socialist Syndicate (LL)
ToDebating the Freedom Liberalization Act of February 3136
MessageWe support all.

Date07:32:51, June 16, 2011 CET
From Beloved Freedom
ToDebating the Freedom Liberalization Act of February 3136
MessageWhile Beloved Freedom favors original proposal, we changed article 1 to ensure passage of the act.

Date14:16:42, June 16, 2011 CET
From Union Socialism Alliance
ToDebating the Freedom Liberalization Act of February 3136
MessageWe do support articles 1 and 3, and would give the benefit of the doubt on article 2. With the government controlling the permits and all. We applaud BF for their strive and willingness to reach a compromise.

Date19:04:58, June 16, 2011 CET
From Social Democratic Party (LL)
ToDebating the Freedom Liberalization Act of February 3136
MessageWe also appreciate BF's willingness to compromise.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 355

no
  

Total Seats: 319

abstain
 

Total Seats: 76


Random fact: Real-life quotations may be used in Particracy, but the real-life speaker or author should always be referenced in an OOC (out-of-character) note alongside the quotation.

Random quote: "Why is it that, as a culture, we are more comfortable seeing two men holding guns than holding hands?" - Ernest Gaines

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 72