We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Private Cars?
Details
Submitted by[?]: Capitalizt Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 2144
Description[?]:
| Recognizing that forcing people to travel collective by forbidding them to have more than one car, recognizing that it is not just a moral but also an economical failure, we ask for a more human policy that encourages and not forces people to travel collective. Give people freedom to choose. If they are forced to have more than one car being a numerous familiy, or they just want more than one car for whatever reason, why can't they? Changes won't be radical as the abovementioned encouragements will keep things changing slowly, in a manner the system can easily adapt to a new transport compliance. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning private cars.
Old value:: Only one car allowed per household, people are encouraged to travel collective and tax incentives on cars using environmentally friendly fuels.
Current: Only cars using environmentally friendly fuels are allowed.
Proposed: Private cars are allowed, but people are encouraged to travel collective and tax incentives are provided for cars using environmentally friendly fuels.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 17:43:30, November 21, 2005 CET | From |   Liberal-Progressive Union | To | Debating the Private Cars? |
| Message | Considering we have no public transport, this one car law should have been repealed 1 day after it appeared in the law forum. |
| Date | 20:04:23, November 21, 2005 CET | From | Left Communist Party | To | Debating the Private Cars? |
| Message | We said no the past 100 times. Not changing because of two parties. |
| Date | 20:13:43, November 21, 2005 CET | From | Liberal-Progressive Union | To | Debating the Private Cars? |
| Message | Maybe change because it's not a realistic law? This is what we do in our org. furrow our brows and discuss into the wee hours the strategy to trick the 6 other parties into voting yes, despite the two parties who 100 times or so tried to change...and the refused for reasons only the creator of all things knows. |
| Date | 22:55:42, November 21, 2005 CET | From | Capitalizt Party | To | Debating the Private Cars? |
| Message | Funny, any real reason for voting no on this? Two parties ain't a sufficient reason for me. |
| Date | 23:22:36, November 21, 2005 CET | From | Liberal-Progressive Union | To | Debating the Private Cars? |
| Message | Maybe if 3 parties proposed it 200 times, it may pass. I don't know.. |
| Date | 13:01:38, November 22, 2005 CET | From | Deltarian Nationalist Party | To | Debating the Private Cars? |
| Message | I can see the only way to get rid of this one is with a wooden stake. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 194 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 206 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Players must never be asked for their Particracy password. This includes Moderation; a genuine Moderator will never ask for your password. |
| Random quote: "Corruption greases the wheels of government, and my private jet." - Sung Dae Kim, former Dranian politician |