We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Cabinet Proposal of March 3140
Details
Submitted by[?]: Commonwealth Liberal Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 3140
Description[?]:
| Proposing a Cabinet |
Proposals
Article 1
The responsibilites of Head of Government will be conducted by the Rutanian Supremacist League
Article 2
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the 
Freedom Party
Article 3
The responsibilites of Food and Agriculture will be conducted by the Urban Party of Rutania
Article 4
The responsibilites of Environment and Tourism will be conducted by the Rutanian Supremacist League
Article 5
The responsibilites of Trade and Industry will be conducted by the Commonwealth Liberal Party
Article 6
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the Urban Party of Rutania
Article 7
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the Rutanian Supremacist League
Article 8
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the Freedom Party
Article 9
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the Urban Party of Rutania
Article 10
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the Rutanian Supremacist League
Article 11
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the Commonwealth Liberal Party
Article 12
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the Urban Party of Rutania
Article 13
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the Freedom Party
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 16:06:14, June 22, 2011 CET | From | New Front Alliance | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of March 3140 |
| Message | Madam Speaker, Surely the NLP jokes with this proposal? No mainstream party could propose a cabinet headed by the RSL. We call on the Urban Party and the Freedom Party to use their influence to alter this most ridiculous offering. |
| Date | 20:23:39, June 22, 2011 CET | From | Freedom Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of March 3140 |
| Message | We understand the concerns of the NFA, but believe that the less mainstream tendencies of the RSL can be managed by the coalition partners. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 379 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 200 | ||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 96 |
| Random fact: In cases where a party has no seat, the default presumption should be that the party is able to contribute to debates in the legislature due to one of its members winning a seat at a by-election. However, players may collectively improvise arrangements of their own to provide a satisfying explanation for how parties with no seats in the legislature can speak and vote there. |
| Random quote: "Corruption is the nightmare that keeps democracy a dream." - Anonymous |