Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: October 5477
Next month in: 02:34:01
Server time: 01:25:58, May 02, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Head of State Amendment

Details

Submitted by[?]: Libertarian Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: June 2147

Description[?]:

In order to achieve economic savings and decrease the financial burden on the populace we propse to merge the offices of Head of State and Head of Government. We see no reason that both offices should exist this merely doubles the cost.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date22:20:57, November 21, 2005 CET
FromLibertarian Party
ToDebating the Head of State Amendment
MessageWe can see no purpose to having a separate Head of State and Head of Government. It will only increase the costs. Less government, more efficient government and cheaper government.

Date01:41:51, November 22, 2005 CET
FromDemocratic-Republican Party
ToDebating the Head of State Amendment
MessageNo. This tradition of two separate offices goes long back into Hutorian history. Why destroy a system that already works?

Date01:51:18, November 22, 2005 CET
FromDemocratic-Republican Party
ToDebating the Head of State Amendment
MessageNo. This tradition of two separate offices goes long back into Hutorian history. Why destroy a system that already works?

Date01:51:55, November 22, 2005 CET
FromDemocratic-Republican Party
ToDebating the Head of State Amendment
Messageooc: Sorry, double-post

Date05:19:01, November 22, 2005 CET
FromPeoples Revolutionary Party
ToDebating the Head of State Amendment
MessageI can agree with it to a point, but this can be seen as a step to cutting out the safty net of the govenment.

Date20:02:38, November 22, 2005 CET
FromLibertarian Party
ToDebating the Head of State Amendment
MessageBy doubling the cost? We have a constitution to protect the citizens from abuse of power. I cannot see the need for another expensive layer of bureauracracy.

Just because something has always worked thus does not mean it is necessarily the best way. Otherwise a lot of coloured people would still be slaves and women would be expected to continue bearing children until their bodes stopped them!

Date02:39:21, November 28, 2005 CET
FromDemocratic-Republican Party
ToDebating the Head of State Amendment
MessageWho are these 'coloured' people you speak of?

ooc: this is not real life.

Date21:25:48, November 28, 2005 CET
FromLibertarian Party
ToDebating the Head of State Amendment
MessageOOC: However RL does lend some good arguments to cases. In a totally invented world we need a little link otherwise everyone would just god mod their arguments into cyber reality.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 73

no
     

Total Seats: 153

abstain
  

Total Seats: 23


Random fact: It usually takes up to an hour for election results to generate. During this time, the "Next Election" date is put forward a month, which is confusing. Do not worry! In a short time, the election result will generate and the "Next Election" date will then correct itself.

Random quote: "The trouble with practical jokes is that very often they get elected." - Will Rogers

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 59