We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Returning to a Forward-Thinking, Self-Checking Testing Policy
Details
Submitted by[?]: Deltarian Liberal Movement
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 3145
Description[?]:
Recognizing a continuing trend as to the loss of favor that Standardized Testing has found within education institutions - and the good reasons for that, the Forum of Deltaria should take action to find the best possible evolution of this system for its children - the workforce of tomorrow. We have an obligation to find a solution now, and the Liberal Conservative Party believes that the proposed method is the best to do so. By allowing local governments the ability to determine testing, our government will be exposed to a variety of practical examples regulated for use by 'national requirements'. These systems will be assured by the governments themselves - with provinces wanting the best for their youth above all others - resulting in a series of highly effective systems with a series of checks and balances brought in to consistently deal with issues that would find a state falling behind others. Each local government would have incentive to perform from their voters and from the national government and would therefore do their best for our future. (Taken from: http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=321235) |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change National Curriculum
Old value:: invalid choice
Current: There is a National Curriculum which all government schools are obliged to follow; non-government schools are partially exempt.
Proposed: invalid choice
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 06:31:11, July 02, 2011 CET | From | Progressive Party | To | Debating the Returning to a Forward-Thinking, Self-Checking Testing Policy |
Message | Agreed. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 130 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 144 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 98 |
Random fact: The people in your nation don't like inactive parties. When you often abstain from voting for a bill, they will dislike your party and your visibility to the electorate will decrease significantly. Low visibility will means you are likely to lose seats. So keep in mind: voting Yes or No is always better than Abstaining. |
Random quote: "Taxes, after all, are dues that we pay for the privileges of membership in an organized society." - Franklin D. Roosevelt |