We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Increased Border Security Act of 3163
Details
Submitted by[?]: Social Democratic Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 3164
Description[?]:
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Travel by foreigners to the nation.
Old value:: The nation imposes minimal border controls on visitors, with cursory security checks, to confirm visitor identities.
Current: The nation imposes minimal border controls on visitors, with cursory security checks, to confirm visitor identities.
Proposed: The nation imposes strict border control on visitors, with intensive security checks, to maintain law and order.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 13:34:59, August 08, 2011 CET | From | Social Democratic Party | To | Debating the Increased Border Security Act of 3163 |
| Message | Hon Oswald Honeysett MP, Leader of the Opposition, Leader of the Hutori Independence Party: Mr. Speaker, nothing is more important than protecting the people of Hutori. Considering the recent tensions with Keymon, and the threat of the Macon Union, we fee this proposal necessary. |
| Date | 04:29:14, August 09, 2011 CET | From | United Leftist Front | To | Debating the Increased Border Security Act of 3163 |
| Message | Hon. Ed O'Brien, Leader of the LDUH Mr. Speaker, I will stand with the Hon. Honeysett on the fundamental grounds that governmental oversight is key to any stable nation. We are a nation of great people, and it is vital to ensure the safety of all Hutorians by whatever means necessary. Knowing very little about the international affairs between Kenyon and the Macon Union, I can only go by my instincts, and they say that these nations are out for the destruction of our great nation and people. Even though my votes hold literally 0 weight in the vote count, I will make my intentions clear on how our government should function. This is a case where governmental expansion is key for the safety of all Hutorians. I applaud the work of the Hutori Independence Party Leader and look forward to working together in the near future. |
| Date | 11:07:45, August 09, 2011 CET | From |  Liberal Democrats | To | Debating the Increased Border Security Act of 3163 |
| Message | Rt Hon Hector James MP, Internal Affairs Minister and Leader of the Liberal Democrats. Mr Speaker, I welcome the LDUH to the debate. However I must question his stance on this. It is neither liberal nor democratic to place such restrictions on travel. Ideology aside, it makes no sense economically. Why would we want to put people off coming to Hutori when we need the revenue that tourism offers? |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes | Total Seats: 60 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 299 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 32 |
| Random fact: If you want to know how many players there are in Particracy right now, check out the Game Statistics buried at the bottom of the World Map screen. |
| Random quote: "Politics is too serious a matter to be left to the politicians." - Charles de Gaulle |