Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5573
Next month in: 01:31:17
Server time: 18:28:42, November 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): Mindus | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Cabinet Proposal of October 3164

Details

Submitted by[?]: Social Democratic Legend Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: June 3165

Description[?]:

As the only member of the proposed cabinet with experience i have of course took the bigger roles but i have allocated it fairly and hope i can use my experience to help the newer parties. We have to agree on this because due to party size and the National Socialist Party's absence this is the only coalition that can gain sufficient votes.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date19:43:04, August 10, 2011 CET
FromPeople's Revolutionary Communist Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of October 3164
MessageWe can not accept this.

Date23:50:26, August 10, 2011 CET
FromUnión Democrática
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of October 3164
MessageWhile the Tories are not party to this cabinet, I am forced to point out the obvious. Experience has nothing to do with forming a cabinet. Composition does. As the plurality party, the Communists are, by right, entitled to more than just defence. At the very least, the premiership should go to the Communists.

-Nicholas Kirkwood
Leader of the Commonwealth Party

Date00:13:22, August 11, 2011 CET
FromSocial Democratic Legend Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of October 3164
MessageActually, i based this on each party's area of expertise- that's why i gave the communists industry, defence etc.
If i am Head of Government i will offer help and advice to the cabinet as they have never done it before.
The Commonwealth Party are clearly trying insidious and underhanded tactics to divide us but we must remain strong!

Date00:16:33, August 11, 2011 CET
FromBaltusian Freedom Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of October 3164
MessageI find this proposal fair but most importantly passable. Of course more just arrangements could be crafted but that doesnt not mean it will pass. We need a government established no more dead lock. This bill can create a new stable government. It rests in the hands of CWP at this point.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 113

no
   

Total Seats: 176

abstain
   

Total Seats: 111


Random fact: Moderation will not accept Cultural Protocol updates which introduce, on a significant scale, cultures which are likely to be insufficiently accessible to players. In particular, for all significant cultures in Particracy, it should be easy for players to access and use online resources to assist with language translation and the generation of character names. Moderation reserves the right to amend Cultural Protocols which are deemed to have introduced significant cultures that are not sufficiently accessible and which are not being actively role-played with.

Random quote: "Dissent is the highest form of patriotism." - Howard Zinn

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 55