Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: October 5475
Next month in: 03:22:58
Server time: 04:37:01, April 27, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): hexaus18 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Electoral Reform X

Details

Submitted by[?]: Old School Liberal Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: March 2147

Description[?]:

Yay! Tenth attempt!

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date06:19:53, November 23, 2005 CET
FromSect of the Green Moon
ToDebating the Electoral Reform X
MessageIf you make it to the thirthieth, we will vote no anyway.

Date06:09:18, November 24, 2005 CET
FromCommunist Party of Kafuristan
ToDebating the Electoral Reform X
MessageThe only reason this ever fails is because of abstaining members, so it is fair to continue to attempt to get this passed.

Date19:35:30, November 25, 2005 CET
FromSect of the Green Moon
ToDebating the Electoral Reform X
MessageWe can't agree and some parties may think this a nusiance. I'll abstain as it is obvious that all parties can't agree on anything like this, so save your proposals on more important issues.

Date08:32:05, November 26, 2005 CET
FromOld School Liberal Party
ToDebating the Electoral Reform X
Message::Shrug:: I'm willing to roll the dice each time with this thing.

I'm sort of surprised, though, since your very own results have been significantly diminished by the current system, Economic Party.

Date01:11:00, November 27, 2005 CET
FromSect of the Green Moon
ToDebating the Electoral Reform X
MessagePolitical Tides and the ideologies can change, and I vote only yes on making it PROPORTIONAL! OSL Party, we aren't going to change the algorithum just to help me get more seats.

Date03:14:13, November 27, 2005 CET
FromOld School Liberal Party
ToDebating the Electoral Reform X
MessageHey, we're totally for making it proportional. The only reason I propose this pseudo-proportional thing is because there doesn't seem to be enough support for a truly fair algorithm. Some lame thing about the larger regions having too much power to go with various unnamed advantages.

I figured this would be a compromise; it would give Hiamou more than 60 seats if nothing else.

Date08:18:26, November 27, 2005 CET
FromCommunist Party of Kafuristan
ToDebating the Electoral Reform X
MessageYep, OSL is right, some parties do disagree with larger regions having such an unfair electoral advantage. What would keep Hiamou and Pabeus from running the country by a tiny majority?

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
     

Total Seats: 144

no
  

Total Seats: 106

abstain
  

Total Seats: 50


Random fact: "Doxxing", or the publishing of personally identifiable information about another player without permission, is forbidden.

Random quote: "Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, from those who are cold and are not clothed. The world in arms is not spending money alone. It is spending the sweat of its laborers, the genius of its scientists, the hopes of its children." - Dwight D. Eisenhower

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 58