We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Cabinet Proposal of May 3167
Details
Submitted by[?]: Progressive-Labour Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 3168
Description[?]:
| Proposing a Cabinet |
Proposals
Article 1
The responsibilites of Head of Government will be conducted by the Democratic Socialist Party of Cobura
Article 2
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the Progressive-Labour Party
Article 3
The responsibilites of Food and Agriculture will be conducted by the Democratic Socialist Party of Cobura
Article 4
The responsibilites of Environment and Tourism will be conducted by the Green-Socialist Alliance
Article 5
The responsibilites of Trade and Industry will be conducted by the UCP (United Constitutionalist Party)
Article 6
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the New Liberals
Article 7
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the UCP (United Constitutionalist Party)
Article 8
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the Democratic Socialist Party of Cobura
Article 9
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the Green-Socialist Alliance
Article 10
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the New Liberals
Article 11
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the Progressive-Labour Party
Article 12
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the Progressive-Labour Party
Article 13
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the Progressive-Labour Party
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 07:15:23, August 16, 2011 CET | From | Democratic Socialist Party of Cobura | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of May 3167 |
| Message | Support. |
| Date | 10:32:24, August 16, 2011 CET | From | UCP (United Constitutionalist Party) | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of May 3167 |
| Message | support |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 342 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 336 |
| Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context. |
| Random quote: "The best politics is right action." - Mahatma Gandhi |