Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: April 5477
Next month in: 03:59:53
Server time: 12:00:06, April 30, 2024 CET
Currently online (5): AethanKal | GLNBei | LC73DunMHP | Svet-Beiteynu | Tayes_Gad | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Natural Resource Utilization Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: UCP (United Constitutionalist Party)

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: September 3171

Description[?]:

Modifications to the Ecology laws to promote recreation and usefulness of designated land.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date22:31:41, August 19, 2011 CET
From Progressive-Labour Party
ToDebating the Natural Resource Utilization Act
Messagewe can not support this bill because it does not preserve our environment at all.

Date02:40:27, August 20, 2011 CET
From New Liberals
ToDebating the Natural Resource Utilization Act
MessageThe New Liberals support the Preserving Our Environment Act of 3169. We believe it will foster important economic growth in Cobura.

Date03:04:31, August 20, 2011 CET
From Progressive-Labour Party
ToDebating the Natural Resource Utilization Act
Messagewhile we agree Cobura needs to foster economic growth, we should not do it through deregulation of the environment.

Date14:06:54, August 20, 2011 CET
From UCP (United Constitutionalist Party)
ToDebating the Natural Resource Utilization Act
MessageWe believe the impact on the environment will be minimal. The proposed replanting strategy is more realistic given that "replanting above replacement levels" raises the question of where the "extra" trees are going.

The logging licensces will raise government funds while also cycling the forest ecosystem and preventing major fires fueled by aged and accumulated underbrush.

The change in drinking water standards will save countless government funds that won't need to be wasted on water for industrial and non-consumption uses.

Date19:59:34, August 20, 2011 CET
From Progressive-Labour Party
ToDebating the Natural Resource Utilization Act
Messageremove articles 2, 3 and change the name of the bill.

Date04:06:38, August 21, 2011 CET
From UCP (United Constitutionalist Party)
ToDebating the Natural Resource Utilization Act
MessageThe requested changes have been made. We feel that the remaining proposals are too important to lose over less necessary issues and we hope we can rely on your full support at this time.

Date04:09:21, August 21, 2011 CET
From Progressive-Labour Party
ToDebating the Natural Resource Utilization Act
Messagewe can support this

Date03:15:44, August 24, 2011 CET
From Corburan Nationalistic Party
ToDebating the Natural Resource Utilization Act
MessageWe will support this

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 75

no

    Total Seats: 0

    abstain
         

    Total Seats: 529


    Random fact: You can view who's online (i.e. been active the last 10 minutes) at the bottom of the menu (either at the top or the side).

    Random quote: "They should rule who are able to rule best." - Aristotle

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 74