We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: SPP Proposal: Free market
Details
Submitted by[?]: Democratic Catholic Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 3178
Description[?]:
| Nerx proposal #9 |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The banking system.
Old value:: The government operates a central bank and all other banks are private.
Current: All banks are privately owned.
Proposed: All banks are privately owned.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 15:45:25, September 04, 2011 CET | From |  United Liberal Caucus | To | Debating the SPP Proposal: Free market |
| Message | This will not get the votes of the LUC. The central bank in article 1 is helpful for regulating the economy and article 2 takes away one of the central tenets of collective bargining from unions. A group the LUC will always fight for. -Taqwaa Nathifa Cham LUC Trade and Industry Minister -Renau Santacruz Jaramillo LUC Finance Minister |
| Date | 16:00:37, September 04, 2011 CET | From | Federal Republic Progressionist Party | To | Debating the SPP Proposal: Free market |
| Message | The FRPP was fine with article 1 they way it is and worked hard to change article 2 to what it is now. |
| Date | 17:11:11, September 04, 2011 CET | From | Coalition for National Unity [CNU] | To | Debating the SPP Proposal: Free market |
| Message | "No." Claire McLaren, Secretary of State for Internal Affairs & Unionist Senatorial Lead |
| Date | 18:06:28, September 04, 2011 CET | From | Democratic Catholic Party | To | Debating the SPP Proposal: Free market |
| Message | To meet the FRPP we suspended the debate on Article. 2. Montgomery - SPP |
| Date | 19:31:05, September 04, 2011 CET | From | Federal Republic Progressionist Party | To | Debating the SPP Proposal: Free market |
| Message | I'm glad to hear that artile 2 was deleted, you have our support. -Sam Kennedy, FRPP financial advisor. |
| Date | 23:25:37, September 04, 2011 CET | From | United Liberal Caucus | To | Debating the SPP Proposal: Free market |
| Message | We appreciate that the SPP removed proposal two! But the LUC cannot support article 1 either. Sorry -Mika Murran Chancellor of the Liberals United for Change |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 82 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 310 | |||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 33 |
| Random fact: RP laws follow the same passing rules as in-game variable laws. Laws that are not of a constitutional nature require a simple majority "Yes" vote from active parties currently holding seats. Laws that are of a constitutional nature require a 2/3 majority "Yes" vote from active parties currently holding seats. RP laws may be abolished a simple majority vote this applies to ANY RP law. |
| Random quote: "It is the absolute right of the State to supervise the formation of public opinion." - Joseph Goebbels |