We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Professional Retirement Age Increase (2145)
Details
Submitted by[?]: Front Canrillaise
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 2146
Description[?]:
| 55 is too low an age to be retiring. If people retire this early then we will start to see a shortage in labour supply, and those who enjoy their jobs and wish to work longer would not be able to do so. Also, people would have less time to save money and their pension will be a great burden for the government and the economy. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The professional retirement age.
Old value:: 55
Current: 65
Proposed: 65
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 23:35:07, November 23, 2005 CET | From |  Mouvement des Conservateurs | To | Debating the Professional Retirement Age Increase (2145) |
| Message | Colleagues, We had a discussion concerning this matter short time ago, it can be found at the House of Representatives. Which by the way, we are happy to welcome you there RFA! http://s14.invisionfree.com/Rildanor Regards. |
| Date | 02:22:35, November 24, 2005 CET | From | Front Canrillaise | To | Debating the Professional Retirement Age Increase (2145) |
| Message | I have replied to the discussion. We feel that this is an issue that needs to be revisited. |
| Date | 16:37:43, November 24, 2005 CET | From | Union for the Rights of Christian Women | To | Debating the Professional Retirement Age Increase (2145) |
| Message | We support. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 30 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 70 | ||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: "Jezvraljogadsrlji" means "Social" in the Jelbic languages. |
| Random quote: "Ask the experimenters why they experiment on animals, and the answer is: "Because the animals are like us." Ask the experimenters why it is morally okay to experiment on animals, and the answer is: "Because the animals are not like us." Animal experimentation rests on a logical contradiction." - Charles R. Magel |