We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Sanctity of Marriage
Details
Submitted by[?]: Conservative Party of Telamon
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 2049
Description[?]:
A marriage should be between 1 man and 1 woman, as it has been for thousands of years. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government policy toward marriage.
Old value:: The government allows all consenting adults to obtain civil marriage contracts.
Current: The government allows all consenting adults to obtain civil marriage contracts.
Proposed: The government only recognises civil marriages between a man and a woman.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 23:38:23, May 05, 2005 CET | From | Conservative Party of Telamon | To | Debating the Sanctity of Marriage |
Message | I don't care if i lose or not...so long as the people know i care about them. |
Date | 23:42:30, May 05, 2005 CET | From | To | Debating the Sanctity of Marriage |
Message | I hope you are sanctified in record time. But why do you want to prohibit some lovers from getting married? |
Date | 23:58:03, May 05, 2005 CET | From | Conservative Party of Telamon | To | Debating the Sanctity of Marriage |
Message | Heh, like they understand love. It's much like two teenagers in love... do they love eachother, or their looks? There are the cases, where it was love....but why should we make special loves to protect the minority? They can just as easily trick the system, and marry a lesbian, but live with his partner if he's so desperate. But otherwise, it's not marriage...marriage has always been 1 man 1 woman.\, in every culture around the world. It's only recently, people have decided to play with the idea, of allowing same-sex marriages. Trust me, you allow that, and someday there will be people lobbying for Polygamy, and children...and animals....and objects. It may sound far-fetched, but this is what happens, when you allow a huge civil rights boost, when not needed. I can just imagine, you down in the road as a 70 yr old man, and being called a conservative, just because you think those ideas are stupid and would ruin society. |
Date | 00:05:27, May 06, 2005 CET | From | To | Debating the Sanctity of Marriage |
Message | What is all that supposed to mean? Marrying children used to be legal, and several of those fine religious leaders you support yourselves on did that. The other stuff, I might be the one supporting those things, if anyone wanted them. Just because you think something is stupid doesn't mean it should be outlawed. What was stupid 100 years ago is accepted today. (racial/gender equality for example). And the current law does not say it is marriage, it says marriage contracts, so in case you have a personal problem with that word you can stop worrying now. |
Date | 00:09:56, May 06, 2005 CET | From | Conservative Party of Telamon | To | Debating the Sanctity of Marriage |
Message | I do not belive in contracts.... to me, when i visualize marriage, it is between 1 man and 1 woman in holy matrimony. If they do not want to go through that process, because of money issues or w/e. Let them pick up the paper instead. And what was stupid 100 years ago, is only called that, due to ignorance. It was thought that Heroin was an all-miracle cure, not it proven to be nothing but a deadly drug. People saw themselves that Slavery was horrid for a big country, as you would need alot of slaves to do the work. As for racial segregation and Apartheid, i understand what was intentioned, unfortuantly it went horridly bad, and led to racism. |
Date | 00:12:58, May 06, 2005 CET | From | To | Debating the Sanctity of Marriage |
Message | Why do straight people marry? For the same reasons gay people want to. It is not sufficient to "marry a lesbian" and live next door to the partner. You obviously believe that since you do not find a person of the same sex romatically attractive that no one else can. You condescend to say its like teenage love, well plenty of people marry their teenage love. You sound to me like somebody who has very little to no personal exposure to gay people and therefore are immensely unqualified to make any judgment in this regard. |
Date | 00:15:06, May 06, 2005 CET | From | Conservative Party of Telamon | To | Debating the Sanctity of Marriage |
Message | Actually i know a few gay people. I gotta know...Why .do Gay people purposely talk high and like femenine stuff. Or do they do that based on the stereotypes and just continue with them. Or is it actually something in their hormones that makes them do that. Well i can't speak for the ones in your region, but the ones in my area do. |
Date | 00:33:21, May 06, 2005 CET | From | To | Debating the Sanctity of Marriage |
Message | They don't all talk high and feminine, and not all who talk that way are gay. It is just that you don't notice the other ones. |
Date | 00:40:39, May 06, 2005 CET | From | Conservative Party of Telamon | To | Debating the Sanctity of Marriage |
Message | It is not that i do not notice them....it is the fact i do not ask their sexuality. Those that are open and i do know of, are all those things mentioned. Do not put words in my mouth. |
Date | 06:33:19, May 06, 2005 CET | From | To | Debating the Sanctity of Marriage |
Message | I've known plenty of gay people, some talk that way others don't. I don't even see why its an issue. No matter how people talk they're still people no better or worse than you for it. I've always thought it was a generally subconscious way of letting people know they're gay without having to tell them, since its not something that is constantly obvious like race. |
Date | 18:59:44, May 06, 2005 CET | From | Federation Under Crazy Killers -- United | To | Debating the Sanctity of Marriage |
Message | A favorite quote I heard on a message board "Let the fruits get hitched. Who cares?" |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes | Total Seats: 52 | |||
no | Total Seats: 35 | |||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Zardugal is a nation based on the old Byzantine Empire, with a modern twist and the Esperanto language. Zardugal is located on the continent of Majatra. |
Random quote: "In America today, you can murder land for private profit. You can leave the corpse for all to see, and nobody calls the cops." - Paul Brooks |