We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Judiciary Prerogative (Separation of Powers) Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Deltarian Liberal Movement
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 3203
Description[?]:
| Submitted by Melinda Quan, Libertarian Faction. It is our national and regional courtrooms, not our national forum that stands on the front line of deciding upon and upholding the law of this country. It is our judges that understand the complexities behind each and every case, not our legislative selves. While we may say that this law means this, and that this clause results in that - we are simply not capable of preparing for every circumstance that may develop in the lifetime of a piece of legislation. We must give our judges the ability to make informed decisions on courtroom matters. Let them truly be the masters of their domain, and show our ability to let go of power in favour of those more prepared than we. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Tort reform on non-civil lawsuits.
Old value:: There is a cap on monetary damages awarded to patients in lawsuits.
Current: There is no cap on monetary damages awarded to patients in lawsuits.
Proposed: There is no cap on monetary damages awarded to patients in lawsuits.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 11:06:27, October 25, 2011 CET | From |  Demokratychna Delic Partija | To | Debating the Judiciary Prerogative (Separation of Powers) Act |
| Message | We believe the cap should be maintained, without it we permit over zealous budgets |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes |
Total Seats: 91 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 191 | |||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 90 |
| Random fact: In Culturally Protected nations, special care must be taken to ensure realism is maintained when role-playing a government controlled by an ethnic and/or religious minority. If it is to be supposed that this government is supported by a majority of the population, then this should be plausibly and sufficiently role-played. The burden of proof is on the player or players role-playing such a regime to demonstrate that it is being done realistically |
| Random quote: "I came, I saw, I conquered" - Julius Caesar |