Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: May 5475
Next month in: 02:01:28
Server time: 09:58:31, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): burgerboys | Mbites2 | Xalvas | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Foreign policy act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Yaskovoi Independent Communist Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: May 2147

Description[?]:

See the below legislations.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date17:48:28, November 25, 2005 CET
From Malfico Progressive Fascist Party
ToDebating the Foreign policy act
MessageWe shall support this act, we are unsure of proposal 1 but accept that some foreigners should be allowed to reside, although we feel race is important we agree qualifications should be a major indicator in wether or not people should be allowed entry. We call for an amendment banning jews from entering the empire.

Date18:12:17, November 25, 2005 CET
From Yaskovoi Independent Communist Party
ToDebating the Foreign policy act
MessageMay I ask for your reasons for banning the Jewish?

Date21:19:29, November 25, 2005 CET
From Kanjoran Conservative Party
ToDebating the Foreign policy act
MessageWe support this proposal.

We should protect our national interests first and foremost. Whilst we would be againt the outright banning on immigration, we should not open our doors to all-comers.

Date14:37:57, November 26, 2005 CET
From Kanjoran State Socialist Party
ToDebating the Foreign policy act
MessageI think that the first bill is horrible and i disagree with it. Though the second bill is a very good idea. If this bil passes i believe that other nations will think us a soft touch and there will be a massive increase of applications to live in our country.

Date14:38:54, November 26, 2005 CET
From Kanjoran Socialist Party
ToDebating the Foreign policy act
MessageIf this passes I will of coarse write up a resolution limiting who can come into the country. As for the second bill, I approve. We should not just allow people to run across the border. Like the immigration crisis in America today.

Date22:28:45, November 26, 2005 CET
From Populist Liberal Party
ToDebating the Foreign policy act
MessageWe strongly support this proposal, to base quotas on qualifications. That's the most sensible way to do it.

We also support strict security checks on visitors.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
      

Total Seats: 327

no

    Total Seats: 0

    abstain
        

    Total Seats: 272


    Random fact: Moderation will not accept Cultural Protocol updates which introduce, on a significant scale, cultures which are likely to be insufficiently accessible to players. In particular, for all significant cultures in Particracy, it should be easy for players to access and use online resources to assist with language translation and the generation of character names. Moderation reserves the right to amend Cultural Protocols which are deemed to have introduced significant cultures that are not sufficiently accessible and which are not being actively role-played with.

    Random quote: "What difference does it make to the dead, the orphans, and the homeless, whether the mad destruction is wrought under the name of totalitarianism or the holy name of liberty and democracy?" - Mahatma Gandhi.

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 77