Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5475
Next month in: 00:31:43
Server time: 03:28:16, April 27, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): Mandarin | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Economic Party Cabinet Proposal I

Details

Submitted by[?]: Sect of the Green Moon

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: December 2146

Description[?]:

Proposing a Cabinet for the betterment of Kafuristan.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date01:39:44, November 26, 2005 CET
FromCommunist Party of Kafuristan
ToDebating the Economic Party Cabinet Proposal I
MessageUnion party, do not be fooled. You are being given no power whatsoever in this in the government.

Date01:45:41, November 26, 2005 CET
FromHelping party
ToDebating the Economic Party Cabinet Proposal I
MessageWhat. you guys are mean. leave more than half of the party out!!????

Date07:30:42, November 26, 2005 CET
FromSect of the Green Moon
ToDebating the Economic Party Cabinet Proposal I
MessageHalf of what party? Communist Party, your ability to manipulate politicians is highly unwanted.

Date08:37:26, November 26, 2005 CET
FromOld School Liberal Party
ToDebating the Economic Party Cabinet Proposal I
MessageIt looks like the head of state's party might have difficulties establishing a government.

Who's up for early elections?

(Remember to support the good ol' OSLP.)

Date08:38:35, November 26, 2005 CET
FromCommunist Party of Kafuristan
ToDebating the Economic Party Cabinet Proposal I
MessageHe meant half of the nation. You included four parties:
- Crazy Party
- Miniature Crazy party
- Yourself
- A potential endorser who generally remains neutral

It is obvious that you only included the Union Party because you wanted this to pass by a small margin with all of your politically similar right-wing parties holding all of the power, and I could tell instantly your strategy. Be informed that the CPK does not manipulate politicians, I inform politicians to prevent them from being manipulated. These are the times that try men's souls.

Date18:55:55, November 26, 2005 CET
From Grand National Party
ToDebating the Economic Party Cabinet Proposal I
MessageAll communism is about is propoganda. No one should believe what the CPK spews out.

Date20:27:25, November 26, 2005 CET
FromOld School Liberal Party
ToDebating the Economic Party Cabinet Proposal I
MessageI think everyone knows what the three parties are trying to do, Commies. And really, it's up to the Union Party to decide if his benefits outweigh his costs. And if they don't, then elections!

Date22:23:51, November 26, 2005 CET
FromSect of the Green Moon
ToDebating the Economic Party Cabinet Proposal I
MessageRandom Fact: You must include as few parties as possible in a cabinet while still maintaining a majority. Also, the Democratic Alliance and the Communist Party tends to leave out three MAJOR parties when coming out with their proposals, and you don't see us making a big debate about it.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 131

no
     

Total Seats: 148

abstain
 

Total Seats: 21


Random fact: To see what other nations are up to and to actively involve yourself in international activities: check the Roleplaying section on the forum! Don't be shy to make a news post about your party's recent achievements.

Random quote: "Isn't it about time that the US government stop supporting dictatorships and avaricious oligarchies with our tax monies, munitions, and diplomacy?" - Ralph Nader

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 74