We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: The Beluzia and Bailon and Luthori Naval Defense Treaty
Details
Submitted by[?]: Stanton House
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 3208
Description[?]:
| this treaty is law and this bill pass will stop the war betwe the two conter http://classic.particracy.net/viewtreaty.php?treatyid=1714 |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 19:45:07, November 05, 2011 CET | From | Progressive Conservatives | To | Debating the The Beluzia and Bailon and Luthori Naval Defense Treaty |
| Message | We're not at war, the treaty the government mentions is nearly 300 years old. That's a moot point, though, because the government didn't include an article: this bill won't actually do anything except prove the government's incompetence. |
| Date | 19:46:58, November 05, 2011 CET | From | Progressive Conservatives | To | Debating the The Beluzia and Bailon and Luthori Naval Defense Treaty |
| Message | Not the mention the country isn't even called "Beluzia and Bailon" anymore. |
| Date | 19:54:34, November 05, 2011 CET | From | Sindicato Obrero Libre | To | Debating the The Beluzia and Bailon and Luthori Naval Defense Treaty |
| Message | I commend the government of Beluzia, for an effort to try to stop the Darnussia-Narikaton war, where Luthori was planning to use this base! Three cheers! Government of Gaduridos |
| Date | 20:00:33, November 05, 2011 CET | From | Sindicato Obrero Libre | To | Debating the The Beluzia and Bailon and Luthori Naval Defense Treaty |
| Message | OOC: By the way, You have to withdraw from it, create a new bill, choose "treaties" and choose to withdraw from it. That will make it official. |
| Date | 21:38:13, November 05, 2011 CET | From | Stanton House | To | Debating the The Beluzia and Bailon and Luthori Naval Defense Treaty |
| Message | the is the old name for this counte for memor it was chane about 100 yeary ago |
| Date | 21:40:58, November 05, 2011 CET | From | Progressive Conservatives | To | Debating the The Beluzia and Bailon and Luthori Naval Defense Treaty |
| Message | We're aware. It shows the treaty, written exactly 293 years ago, is a thing of the past and not the present. |
| Date | 01:50:03, November 06, 2011 CET | From | Stanton House | To | Debating the The Beluzia and Bailon and Luthori Naval Defense Treaty |
| Message | the treaty may be need to be undate but for this treaty need to sate in law |
| Date | 06:21:11, November 06, 2011 CET | From | Progressive Conservatives | To | Debating the The Beluzia and Bailon and Luthori Naval Defense Treaty |
| Message | Regardless, this bill - without any articles - won't actually do anything. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |
| yes |
Total Seats: 500 | |
| no | Total Seats: 0 | |
| abstain |
Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Never use the same password as a friend. If two or more active accounts use the same password, they will be inactivated. |
| Random quote: "Whatever crushes individuality is despotism, by whatever name it may be called and whether it professes to be enforcing the will of God or the injunctions of men." - John Stuart Mill |