We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: SDP Manifesto I Secularism
Details
Submitted by[?]: Social Democratic Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 3212
Description[?]:
. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The governments stance on religious schools.
Old value:: Religious schools are allowed, but are strictly regulated. Only recognised religions may set up religious schools.
Current: Any religion may set up a school, with no regulations.
Proposed: Religious schools are not allowed.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy with respect to prayer in schools.
Old value:: Teacher-led prayers are mandatory in schools.
Current: The government leaves this decision up to the schools themselves.
Proposed: Teacher-led prayers in schools are forbidden.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Government policy concerning religions.
Old value:: There is an official state religion, and membership is mandatory.
Current: There is no government policy concerning a state religion.
Proposed: There is no government policy concerning a state religion.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 06:36:36, November 13, 2011 CET | From | Left Libertarian Alliance of Cats | To | Debating the SDP Manifesto I Secularism |
Message | The executive will interpret this legislation as excluding honoring cats from its definitions. The sacredness of Cats is of such a paramount importance that it transcends mere earthly religions. -GALT FREYJA, Chief Servant of the Cats |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |
yes | Total Seats: 0 | |
no | Total Seats: 75 | |
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: If you want to leave Particracy, please inactivate yourself on your user page to save the moderation team some time. |
Random quote: "Global warmers predict that global warming is coming, and our emissions are to blame. They do that to keep us worried about our role in the whole thing. If we aren't worried and guilty, we might not pay their salaries. It's that simple." - Kary Mullis |